跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 18:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 18:54 — 2026-11-15 18:54(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 18:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 18:01(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16069

"It's Just a Small Weapon": What Rewarding Misbehavior During RL Does to Character-Trained Models

Mohammad Omar Khursheed, Thomas Morris, Fabien Roger

原文摘要

Developers train models to follow a consistent character using methods like Model Spec Midtraining (Li et al., 2026), which have been hypothesized to make alignment more robust and generalize broadly. However, it is possible for subsequent RL with misspecified rewards to work against character training. In this work, we apply character training to teach gpt-oss-20b a semi-realistic constitution and study how it interacts with two types of RL that reward breaking the constitution's rules (opposing RL): answering harmful requests rewritten as math problems, and reward hacking in agentic coding environments. The character-trained models learn both behaviors easily, though they are slightly slower than gpt-oss-20b to answer harmful requests. Character-trained models also display more motivated reasoning on harmful answers than gpt-oss-20b, and hack on some tasks which monitors find harder to catch. Finally, since explaining the reasons behind rules can improve how alignment generalizes (Kutasov et al., 2026), we compare constitutions that justify the same rules by grounding them in a value or not, and find little difference between motivations on misalignment, honesty, and capability evaluations.

cs.LG

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.04413

(Mis)generalization of Helpful-Only Fine-tuning

Mohammad Omar Khursheed, Baram Sosis, Fabien Roger

原文摘要

Helpful-only models, that is, models that are trained to always follow user intent, are valuable for dangerous capability evaluations and other areas of AI R&D where refusals would be an obstacle. Little is known about the generalization properties of helpful-only training: helpful-only models refuse less than their harmless counterparts, but previous work has not studied other dimensions of their alignment. We study the shortcomings of existing helpful-only models. We find that some show emergent misalignment, others have residual refusal behaviors, and most show poor steerability, sycophancy, and incoherent character. We show that simple anti-refusal training can cause many of these issues. None of these problems are necessary consequences of helpful-only training, though: we show that synthetic document fine-tuning and adding character-related questions to SFT and RL can mitigate them.

cs.LG