跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:30 — 2026-11-15 01:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16089

One Future Fits All: Text-to-image AI and the Narrowing of Global Imagination

Stephanie Diepeveen, Somnath Batabyal, Edward Ademolu, Peter Chonka, Gabriele de Seta, Iginio Gagliardone, Elisabeth Gunawan, Fabio Gygi 等 14 位作者

原文摘要

Persistence of algorithmic bias is well established in scholarship, reflecting, reproducing and reshaping inequalities and injustices. Yet, as technology changes, we cannot assume that inequalities will be reproduced in the same or similar forms. This article explores the reproduction of bias in text-to-image generative AI, looking at the tool, Microsoft Bing Create, based on DALL E 3. It draws on results of a collaborative exploratory study of 907 image-based outputs of text-to-image generation in 15 languages and concerning 12 countries. We utilise the notion of synthetic probes (de Seta, 2024) to iteratively explore correlations of inputs and outputs within the context of place, language and power. We find striking simplicity in the scope of possibilities through which Bing Create considers the current and future city. Stripping out (explicit) indications of conflict, poverty and politics, we are left with images whose localised diversity harkens back to versions of Orientalist imaginaries. Images of the future emerge as one civilising mission or modernisation narrative, with all places headed to one future of hovercrafts, urban gardens and solar panels, encased in a composition of shades of blue and green. We argue that the visual outputs of this generative AI tool reflect and reproduce a simple but pervasive and persistent colonial/developmental worldview. We explore explanations for this emergent narrative and its implications, suggesting the threat of generative AI is not in its complexity or intelligence, but rather its banality. With this, we propose banality not as mere repetition, but the systematic narrowing of representational possibility: a convergence on tourist-friendly, depoliticised, development-saturated visual grammars that smooth contradiction and foreclose plural futurisms.

cs.CY