跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:12 — 2026-11-15 01:12(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15172

Where Language-Model Vocabulary Rose on Stack Exchange

Fengming Liu

原文摘要

Stack Overflow banned answers generated by ChatGPT five days after the model's release, and many other Stack Exchange sites announced similar rules. I measure the vocabulary of the answers posted afterwards, 3.8 million answers on 170 sites from 2019 to 2024. A fixed list of 56 words that language models overuse rose about 14 percent above its pre-2023 trend, while the highest of 1,000 frequency-matched lists of ordinary words rose about 7 percent. In a screen of 15 site traits measured before the release, the strongest predictor of where the rise happened was the share of answers that received a body edit within 30 days of posting. On the least edited third of sites the list rose about 29 percent relative to matched controls, and on the most edited third it did not change. The gradient is also present among answers that were never edited. It follows the share of answers edited by their own authors, and the share edited by others adds little once that share is held fixed. Use of the model is unobserved, so these results cannot separate lower use on sites with a high self-edit share from any effect of editing on what the vocabulary records. Any vocabulary-based estimate for the network as a whole therefore pools sites where the marker vocabulary rose sharply with sites where it did not change.

cs.CL · cs.CY · cs.SI