跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:28 — 2026-11-15 01:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15023

SkinAdvisor: An AI-Driven Decision Framework for Skin Production Planning via Multi-Modal Transformer Sales Forecasting

Ge Fan, Kai Wang, Chaoyun Zhang, Yingjie Li, Yuze Liu, Junyang Chen

原文摘要

Skins, cosmetic in-game items, are a primary revenue stream for modern online games, yet production decisions (which skins to make, when to release, how to price) remain driven by intuition and retrospective analytics. We present SkinAdvisor, an AI-driven decision framework for skin production planning, powered by SkinCast, a deployed multi-modal Transformer forecasting 180-day per-day sales trajectories for unreleased skins. SkinCast couples four encoders: a pretrained Informer for player-preference time series, a pretrained Player-Hero-Skin graph embedder for relational priors, and two lightweight Transformers for skin attributes and release context, fused through a shared backbone with a local-plus-global day-x positional encoding and decoded by an N-layer Informer in a single non-autoregressive pass. SkinAdvisor plugs these forecasts into a serving pipeline (Select -> Fill -> Infer -> Sales -> ROI -> Ranking) that ranks candidate skins by forecast-based ROI and supports multi-candidate comparison. The system has been in production for a full release cycle. Offline experiments show SkinCast reduces RMSE by ~20% over the strongest baseline (Informer) and ~60% over classical methods; stress tests on a 16-core CPU server confirm p99 latency under 8ms and peak throughput above 1100 rps. We report two deployment lessons: order-of-magnitude accuracy suffices for production decisions, and pretrained embeddings can leak temporal information, requiring season-based splitting to prevent.

cs.LG · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05997

From Waste to Discovery: Recycling High-Scored Unexposed Candidates in Taobao Feed Recommendation

Ge Fan, Kai Meng, Huiping Chu, Yuning Jiang, Han Zhu, Bo Zheng

原文摘要

Helping users discover new interests is vital to the long-term health of industrial recommender systems, yet the usual remedy, boosting exposure of under-explored (discovery) content, often backfires in production. We report URED (Unexposed Recycling for Efficient Discovery), a training-free recall-stage system serving Taobao feed recommendation at Alibaba for over six months to tens of millions of daily active users. It rests on a production-validated insight: naive boosting fails because it injects cold, information-poor candidates that rankers systematically over-estimate, buying no discovery gain while risking engagement. Items scored highly but never exposed (signals industrial pipelines routinely discard) form a pool that is both relevant and reliably predictable. Over a 30-day horizon URED aggregates them and re-injects at recall time through a lightweight pipeline spanning offline storage, distributed aggregation, and low-latency online serving, adding under 1% latency via a single O(1) lookup per request with no model retraining. Online A/B tests show +3.47% discovered categories and +8.47% content richness with engagement preserved: completion video views rise significantly (+2.62%) and total views move positive (+0.36%, not significant). Ablations confirm both design pillars are necessary: a one-day window collapses the discovery gain to +0.55% (not significant), and random injection without score filtering yields no gain while trending negative on engagement (-0.17%). Across production recall channels, URED reaches 13.9x the platform-average discovery rate (6.3x the strongest nearline baseline) at engagement quality on par with the platform average. We share deployment details and lessons for practitioners facing the exploration-exploitation dilemma under tight resource constraints.

cs.AI · cs.IR

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39426

UGR: Unified Generative Ranking for Heterogeneous E-commerce Recommendation

Zonghe Shao, Huabin Chen, Sitong Lu, Fangmei Zhu, Yingcai Ma, Ge Fan, Jinguo Gao, Wei Shi 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

List-wise ranking in e-commerce recommendation must balance user utility and commercial value across organic content, ads, and candidates from other businesses, while modeling candidate interactions and sequential dependencies. Existing generative ranking methods typically learn from logged exposure sequences and operate on truncated candidate sets from a single business. Exposure-sequence learning may not fully exploit post-exposure feedback signals. Meanwhile, generative ranking over heterogeneous, multi-business candidates remains less explored, particularly when recommendation scores and advertising value must be jointly modeled under generalized second-price (GSP) auctions. We propose Unified Generative Ranking (UGR), which performs generative ranking over the full request-level multi-business heterogeneous candidate set, typically comprising around a thousand candidates in production, and directly generates multi-business ranking lists through candidate-aware autoregressive decoding. To go beyond exposure-sequence imitation, UGR introduces complementary feedback supervision through weighted supervised fine-tuning and permutation preference optimization, which respectively leverage observed post-exposure feedback and feedback-derived preferences among permutations. UGR uses a training-time advertising debiasing tower to model historical ad exposure effects and incorporates current ad value during serving while preserving the existing allocation and GSP pricing rules. Multi-value sequence retrieval produces candidate ranking lists, and the existing downstream evaluator selects the final list for exposure. Offline experiments demonstrate consistent gains in ranking quality, while online A/B tests on Taobao's Guess You Like recommendation service yield improvements of 1.76% in Core IPV, 3.29% in Transaction Volume, and 2.10% in GMV over the production baseline.

cs.IR