跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 01:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:52 — 2026-11-15 01:52(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 01:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 01:32(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.09323

TRL-Bench: Standardizing Cross-Paradigm Representation-Level Evaluation of Tabular Encoders

Wei Pang, Xiangru Jian, Hehan Li, Zhixuan Yu, Alex Xue, Jinyang Li, Zhengyuan Dong, Xinjian Zhao 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Tabular encoders are usually evaluated inside task-specific end-to-end pipelines, so models from different training paradigms are difficult to compare directly even when they operate on similar tabular signals. We introduce TRL-Bench, a multi-granular tabular representation learning (TRL) benchmark that standardizes cross-paradigm representation-level evaluation: each encoder exports row-, column-, or table embeddings through its supported wrapper, and shared lightweight heads probe them across three suites: TRL-CTbench (column/table), TRL-Rbench (row), and TRL-DLTE (compositional Data-Lake Table Enrichment spanning all three granularities). To support this standardized setting, we release curated benchmark assets and task reformulations, including 50 OpenML tables with 123 verified targets, 16 row-pair linkage rewrites, and a 47,772-table DLTE lake derived from 1,379 parent tables. Across 20 models and 16 tasks, TRL-Bench shows that once downstream conditions are standardized, encoder quality is capability-specific rather than captured by a single leaderboard. In TRL-CTbench, generic text encoders often lead on tasks with strong surface-text signal, while tabular specialists win where their pretraining objective aligns with the task. In TRL-Rbench, within-table prediction and cross-table linkage favor different training regimes, with atomic linkage performance correlating strongly with the row-matching stage of DLTE pipelines. In TRL-DLTE, the strongest pipelines combine capability-matched specialists rather than reuse a single encoder, and top end-to-end quality depends on non-additive compositional fit rather than per-stage marginal rank alone. TRL-Bench provides a common protocol for measuring reusable signal in exported tabular representations under shared downstream conditions. Code: https://github.com/LOGO-CUHKSZ/TRL-Bench; data is released on Hugging Face.

cs.AI · cs.DB

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09006

Rethinking Latent Reasoning for Generative Recommendation: Beyond Teacher-Generated CoT and Recurrent Hidden-State Feedback

Yiwen Chen, Fuwei Zhang, Zehao Chen, Deqing Wang, Hehan Li, Peizhi Xu, Hanmeng Liu, Shuanglong Li 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

Latent reasoning in generative recommendation faces two practical barriers: constructing teacher-generated chain-of-thought (CoT) supervision is costly, and recurrent hidden-state feedback requires a specialized execution loop. We revisit both the supervision source and the computation interface. A step-level diagnosis measures how recommendation CoT supports next-item prediction and trace coherence. In the analyzed traces, history analysis is the only step with positive mean contributions on both dimensions, while later preference and intent steps have negative mean answer contributions. Guided by this finding, we propose PHiT (Prefilled, History-Informed Thought Tokens), which learns intermediate states from semantic targets extracted directly from observed item histories. PHiT aggregates cached sparse item encodings to construct these targets and supervises the contextual states of distinct vocabulary thought tokens. All thought tokens are supplied together as ordinary input IDs during a single causal prefill, removing the need for recurrent final-state feedback. With supervised fine-tuning alone, PHiT outperforms the compared baselines across four recommendation benchmarks. Controlled ablations support the value of input-matched semantic supervision, while cost measurements show fast target construction with training time comparable to the recommendation-only thought-token baseline.

cs.IR