跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 06:43 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 06:45 — 2026-11-15 06:45(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 06:43最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 06:42(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11745

Reproducible quantum clustering for single-cell transcriptome atlases

Henry Han

原文摘要

Current single-cell clustering pipelines discard most genes and can yield inconsistent clusters across random seeds. We introduce KQE-2, a training-free hybrid quantum-classical framework for reproducible whole-transcriptome clustering. KQE-2 maps cells into entanglement-free quantum states, enabling exact feature evaluation on classical hardware and direct checks on a quantum processor. Theoretically, we prove that removing entanglement is necessary and sufficient to bound single-qubit feature variance locally. Practically, while retraining scVI shifted 14% of cells and altered rare-type markers and drug targets, KQE-2 delivered identical biology across runs. On standard highly variable genes, the quantum encoding alone raised accuracy on a developing cortex from 0.61 to 0.79. KQE-2 scales to 11.4 million nuclei on one server, outperforming the compared methods on eight of ten complete atlases (and within the best method's run-to-run range on two), and leads on six even under standard downstream clustering.

cs.AI · q-bio.GN · q-bio.QM

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08341

增强压缩式AI智能体记忆中的局部与全局结构

Enhancing Local and Global Structure in Compressed AI Agent Memory

Henry Han

AI 速读 基于摘要

作者提出局部感知量化(LAQ),用基于远距离结构证明界构造的铰链目标训练OPQ码本,在保持局部保真度的同时提升压缩记忆的全局保真度。

cs.AI

查看原文摘要

AI agents store text as embedding vectors and compress them at scale. A compression is accepted when each item's nearest neighbors survive, but agents also consolidate, delete, and compare memories, tasks that depend on which items lie far apart. We evaluate both ends with two label-free fidelities from our prior work: the local fidelity $L$ at 10 neighbors and the global fidelity $G$ at 30 to 50 percent of the memory. At 96 bytes per passage, rescored binary codes reach an $L$ of 0.97 yet move 10.1 percent of passages to another theme; PCA with 8-bit codes, at an $L$ of 0.77, moves 1.7 percent. Rescoring leaves the stored codes, and thus $G$, unchanged. We prove that across the $G$ band, $1-ν_k$ is at most 2 to 2.18 times the square root of the near-far rank-violation rate, and that this rate follows the distance noise of the compression (correlation 0.979). Our locality-aware quantization (LAQ) turns the bound into a hinge objective on the codebooks of an OPQ index, keeping its bytes, rotation, and search. To our knowledge, LAQ is the first quantizer whose objective comes from a proven bound on the far end. Reconstruction alone raises $G$ in 0 of 52 held-out runs; the far hinge raises it in all 52. LAQ raises $G$ in all 52 ($p=8.5\times 10^{-4}$ over 13 memory-encoder groups), including the external FinDER memory, has the highest $G$ of seven equal-size quantizers in all 12 Multi-Doc-2025 runs, scales to a million passages, and keeps evidence recall.

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.00290

Quantifying Local and Global Fidelity of Nonlinear Embeddings

Henry Han

原文摘要

Dimension reduction rests on a claim: t-SNE and UMAP preserve local structure, PCA global structure. Our DLP curve is the share of each point's k nearest neighbors a map keeps. Corrected for chance, it gives L at k=10 and G over 30 to 50% of the data, local and global fidelity. At the midpoint the curve is provably a rank correlation of distances. The LG reversal test decides, with a stated error rate, which of two maps is local and which global. On twelve datasets of up to 1.38 million points, G agrees with established global scores at 0.84 and 0.93, and the area under R_NX at 0.22 and 0.30. The entity fidelity E, read at each point's entity size, predicts which entities a map loses beyond L and G where entity sizes differ. In an agent memory of one million passages, t-SNE and PCA cross at 150,000 passages (p=2.6e-5).

cs.AI