跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:12 — 2026-11-15 01:12(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16239

Optimal feature selection for firewall log analysis using Machine learning and Hybrid Metaheuristic algorithms

Seungwoo Han, Gil Hong, Jewan Kim, Jeuk Yu, Sangjun Lee, Byeongok Cho, Jusung Jeon

原文摘要

Firewall log classification is important to monitor network traffic. Machine learning classifiers using network-related features have shown good results for this task, but high-dimensional features slow down classification. In this paper, we apply feature selection using bee swarm optimization with Q-learning-based local search (QBSO-FS) to the UCI Internet Firewall Data Set, together with random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and Bernoulli naïve Bayes (Bernoulli NB) classifiers. The first version of this preprint selected and evaluated feature subsets on the same 5-fold cross-validation of the full data set, which contains 12.8\% exact duplicates; the reported scores are therefore optimistically biased. In this extended version, we re-evaluate the method with a leakage-free protocol: the data are split into training, validation, and test sets, features are selected using the validation set only, and accuracy and macro-averaged scores are measured once on the untouched test set, for both the raw data and a deduplicated, preprocessed version. On a single stratified split, QBSO-FS selects 5--7 features. The selected subsets clearly improve Macro-F1 over all features for KNN on both data sets and for RF on the deduplicated data (by 8--19 percentage points). For RF on the raw data and for Bernoulli NB, the differences (0.2--1.5 percentage points) may not hold for a different split. RF with 7 selected features reaches 99.90\% accuracy and 94.88\% Macro-F1 on the deduplicated data. On the same split, this exceeds our re-implementations of the deep neural network configurations of previous studies and the feature subset selected by particle swarm optimization in one of them, while the run time saved on this low-dimensional data set is small. These results suggest that the method can support automatic firewall log analysis, while evaluation over multiple splits remains future work.

cs.LG · cs.CR · cs.NE