跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 03:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 04:12 — 2026-11-15 04:12(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 03:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 03:36(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11510

Reaching Is Not Finding: Map-Anchored Visual Prompting for the Last Mile of Aerial Vision-Language Navigation

Ningbo Li, Kebin Liu, Jingcan Chen, Weichen Zhang, Rong Ding, Yunhao Liu, Mo Li

原文摘要

Aerial vision-language navigation (VLN) asks a drone to find an object described in natural language. The description usually locates the object relative to named landmarks, such as streets and buildings. We observe that current navigators often bring the drone close to the target and then stop at the wrong place: they reach the target without finding it. This gap is shared by navigators of very different designs, from imitation learners to a fine-tuned 7B vision-language model. A simple test reveals the cause. When we replace the target object in the instruction with another one next to the same landmarks, no navigator goes to it, and most stop where they did before. Navigators learn to reach the landmarks, not to identify the described object. We therefore propose MAP-VP, a plug-and-play module for the last step. After any navigator stops, MAP-VP draws the landmarks named in the instruction onto the drone's current view, using the landmark outlines that the benchmark provides on a map. A fine-tuned 4B vision-language model then locates the target relative to these landmarks. The training data are generated automatically from the benchmark annotations. Neither drawing the landmarks nor fine-tuning helps much alone, but together they are highly effective. Without retraining any navigator, MAP-VP significantly improves all six navigators we test on CityNav. It roughly doubles the success rate of the two strongest trained navigators, raising HETT from 25.9% to 54.6% and FlightGPT from 24.2% to 48.9%, whereas CityNav's official detector-based last step adds less than two points to HETT.

cs.CV