跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 04:40 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 04:50 — 2026-11-15 04:50(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 04:40最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 04:38(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15766

Prior-as-Skill: Remember Outside and Read Inside with On-Policy Self-Distillation for Self-Evolving VLM Agents

Yan Lin, Jingyu Sun, Yifei Qian, Zhengtao Yao, Yuxia Wang, Daizong Liu, Chun Pong Lau, Zhongliang Guo 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Self-evolving visual agents keep what they learn as skills: key frames with step notes on a task's steps and their order. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) is now a popular way to train such skills into a vision-language model that matches, on its own answers, a teacher that also reads the written order. At deployment, frames often go missing or show an unusual order, as when a person or a website reorders the steps. Existing internalization methods keep any order they store in the frame-reading weights: trained on full frames, the model guesses when they are missing, and trained with frames withheld, it stores the order, so memory can override what it sees. We propose PriorSplit, which fills in missing frames from an order kept outside the model, with no training beyond OPSD. It counts which of two neighboring steps comes first in training episodes, and the model checks if both asked steps are in view: if so, it answers from the frames, and otherwise the counts answer. Extensive experiments on synthetic skills with five models and on step-tagged order questions in new episodes of seen web, cooking and egocentric tasks demonstrate that, with frames missing, PriorSplit outperforms every compared method at OPSD's training cost. With Qwen3-VL-4B on synthetic skills, it also stays close to OPSD on unusual orders, where methods that gain most by storing the order fall behind.

cs.CV · cs.AI

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2608.00967

TrajWiki: Source-Grounded Memory Trajectories for Long-Horizon Dialogue Agents

Jingyu Sun, Yuyang Xue, Mingyang Li, Zhengtao Yao, Jiachen Li, Yang Cui, Wenhao Cai, Haozhe Liu 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

Large language model agents have shown strong capabilities in generating coherent and contextually appropriate responses, yet robust long-horizon dialogue remains limited by the lack of external memory that is traceable, updatable, and diagnostically transparent. Existing memory-augmented agents often store memories as isolated records or overwritable states, making it difficult to preserve how information originates, evolves, conflicts, or becomes obsolete over time. We propose \textbf{TrajWiki}, a trajectory-based memory framework for long-horizon conversational agents. Instead of treating memory as static entries, TrajWiki represents each memory as a source-grounded evolution trajectory, maintained through immutable episodic snapshots and claim-level operations such as \texttt{ADD}, \texttt{REVISE}, and \texttt{DEPRECATE}. To reduce fragmentation and retrieval cost, TrajWiki further introduces \textbf{Memory Wiki}, a persistent intermediate layer that incrementally compiles dialogue history into structured and interlinked wiki pages capturing salient entities, events, quantities, topics, and conflicts. At inference time, queries are routed hierarchically from relevant wiki pages to linked memory trajectories, then to corresponding snapshots and source messages for evidence-grounded answer synthesis. Experiments on LoCoMo and MedMT show that TrajWiki improves long-horizon dialogue performance across both open-source and closed-source LLM backbones, while providing greater interpretability and diagnostic visibility into memory evolution, retrieval failures, and answer generation.

cs.AI

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2607.20827

Auditing Provenance Sensitivity in LLM Agent Action Selection

Junchi Liao, Qiang Huang, Rui Qian, Xutao Mao, Juntao Cheng, Kangning Cui, Yu Li, Jingyu Sun 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

LLM agents choose tools and arguments from context that mixes user requests, tool outputs, retrieved records, memory, and untrusted text. Evidence can be relevant without being authorized to determine a decision, so a correct action need not be grounded only in permitted evidence. We introduce a target-specific authorization audit that labels context factors separately for each tool and argument target. Its primary test holds the task, proposition, position, and policy fixed while changing only the proposition's source authority. We then test behavior when valid evidence is weakened and use context-subset interactions as a secondary localization diagnostic. Across 450 controlled next-action tasks and multiple open-weight LLM families, trusted and untrusted variants produce different actions in 5.4 percent of competing cases versus 1.7 percent of supporting cases. Under controlled degradation, unauthorized competition is retained in a full-correct, mixed-error, clean-correct pattern in 2.4 percent of comparisons, with a 95 percent confidence interval from 2.1 to 3.0 percent. These are controlled stress-set rates, not deployment prevalence. The models respond to textual source-authority cues, but this does not prevent untrusted evidence from influencing their actions.

cs.AI