跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+98新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 23:30 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 00:07 — 2026-11-16 00:07(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 23:30最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 23:27(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2412.01968

论数据交换经济的理论基础

On the Theoretical Foundations of Data Exchange Economies

Hannaneh Akrami, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar

AI 速读 基于摘要

提出无支付数据交换框架,要求互惠公平与核心稳定,并证明在单调连续效用下公平稳定交换存在,进而研究近似解的计算复杂度。

cs.GT

查看原文摘要

Organizations increasingly seek to share and access datasets to improve their ML models and derive insights. Despite the immense demand for quality data, data exchange and collaboration have not reached their full potential, as cited by the European Commission. One of the key reasons is the lack of reciprocity, where some participants perceive their contribution to others to be of higher value than what they receive in return. We propose a general framework for data exchange without payments, focusing on two main properties: (i) reciprocal fairness, which ensures that each agent receives utility proportional to their contribution to the total welfare -- contributions are quantifiable using well-established credit-sharing functions such as the Shapley share and proportional share, and (ii) core-stability, which guarantees that no coalition of agents can identify an exchange among themselves which they all unanimously prefer to the current exchange. Surprisingly, we show that fair and stable exchanges exist for all monotone continuous utility functions. Building on this, we investigate the computational complexity of finding approximate fair and stable exchanges. We present a local search algorithm for instances with monotone submodular utility functions and cross-monotone credit-sharing functions, e.g., Shapley share. We prove that this problem belongs to CLS ($=$ PPAD $\cap$ PLS) under mild assumptions. Our framework opens up several intriguing theoretical avenues for future research on data economics.

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.38897

RARE: Response-Aware Rational Equilibrium in Budget-Constrained Pricing Games

Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Xin Huang, Eklavya Sharma

原文摘要

We study a pricing game in markets with budget-constrained buyers, where each seller offers a single good and sets its price. We consider both non-rivalrous goods, such as datasets, and rivalrous goods, such as physical goods. For non-rivalrous goods, each buyer chooses a utility-maximizing bundle within her budget. For rivalrous goods, an allocation rule selects a Pareto-optimal allocation subject to the buyers' budgets and the goods' supply constraints. Pure Nash equilibria often fail to exist in this game. A key reason is that Nash equilibrium assumes that the other sellers keep their prices fixed when one seller deviates. In practice, however, sellers harmed by a price change may respond, for example, by matching the new price. We propose a new equilibrium notion called Response-Aware Rational Equilibrium (RARE). At a RARE, every deviation by a seller can be deterred by a response from the other sellers, in which no responder earns less than she did right after the deviation. Every Nash equilibrium is a RARE. Assuming that the allocation rule is continuous in prices, we show that a RARE always exists for rivalrous goods, and for non-rivalrous goods when buyers have equal budgets. Moreover, the RARE that we construct extracts the buyers' entire budget. For non-rivalrous goods with unequal budgets, we show that an approximate RARE exists, where a deviating seller can increase her revenue by a factor equal to the ratio of the average budget to the minimum budget. We also study a natural dynamic in which sellers repeatedly raise their prices to earn the revenue that they could guarantee themselves by deviating. We show that, in the settings where we prove exact existence, this dynamic reaches a RARE with additive error $δ$ within $\lfloor B/δ\rfloor$ rounds, where $B$ is the buyers' total budget. This paper's main results have been formally verified in Lean 4.

cs.GT