跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 03:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 04:22 — 2026-11-15 04:22(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 03:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 03:36(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.15953

Small area learning

Katarzyna Reluga, Nicola Salvati, Setareh Ranjbar, Nikos Tzavidis, Mark van der Laan

原文摘要

Small area estimation (SAE) traditionally borrows strength across domains through a prespecified working model. We introduce small area learning (SAL), a novel learner-agnostic framework that formulates SAE as a multi-target semi-supervised learning problem and treats outcome prediction as a nuisance task. Areas may differ through unrestricted covariate shift and structured conditional shift, with information shared through common and area-specific components. We develop estimators with and without cross-fitting, accommodating low-complexity and flexible learners and unifying synthetic, model-based, and semi-supervised estimators. For area means, we establish a unified asymptotic theory for these estimator families, characterizing conditions for consistency, asymptotic normality and providing variance estimators and confidence intervals without prescribing a particular learning algorithm. We extend the theory to settings with only aggregated population covariates and characterize the resulting aggregation bias. SAL reveals clearly a bias-variance trade-off: partial residual correction in classical estimators can reduce mean squared error, whereas full correction yields estimators robust to the misspecification of working models, potentially at higher variance. Simulations yield RMSE reductions of 34%-49% relative to direct estimation, with the best configuration varying across settings. The numerical studies also illustrate how shrinkage can produce overly optimistic confidence intervals at the expense of strong modeling assumptions.

stat.ME · cs.LG · math.ST