跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 03:56 — 2026-11-16 03:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2403.17755

DataCook: Exploring Anti-Adversarial Fingerprints for Healthcare Data Usage Control

Sihan Shang, Jun Yan, Danli Shi, Haizhong Zheng, Shuangjia Zheng, Wei Zhao, Jiancheng Yang

原文摘要

Purpose: Healthcare AI increasingly relies on high-quality datasets, yet medical data are scarce, costly to curate, and tightly regulated in terms of data access. More critically, once medical data are leaked or accessed without authorization, data owners have limited means to prevent such data from being used to train and deploy downstream models. To address this gap, we propose DataCook, a deployment-stage usage-control framework based on anti-adversarial fingerprints. Materials and Methods: Specifically, DataCook transforms raw samples through a private cooking procedure that embeds anti-adversarial fingerprints. Models trained on the cooked data retain strong utility when evaluated on similarly cooked inputs, while their performance on raw inputs is reduced, making downstream model utility dependent on access to the private cooking function. We evaluate DataCook on 2D, 3D, and high-resolution medical images, as well as structured healthcare tabular data, across multiple model architectures and adaptive attack settings. Results: Across the evaluated settings, DataCook generally preserves authorized model utility while reducing performance on unauthorized raw inputs. The authorization-dependent behavior is observed across multiple medical imaging settings, model architectures, and adaptive attack conditions, supporting the feasibility of the proposed deployment-stage usage-control mechanism. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the feasibility of authorization-dependent model use at deployment, while the effectiveness of the current framework remains dependent on the specific task and evaluation metric.

cs.AI · cs.CR · cs.CV

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2511.09394

EyeAgent: An Agentic AI System for Multimodal Clinical Decision Support in Ophthalmology

Danli Shi, Xiaolan Chen, Bingjie Yan, Weiyi Zhang, Jiancheng Yang, Ruoyu Chen, Xinyuan Wu, Siyu Huang 等 26 位作者

原文摘要

Current medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems are often task-specific, poorly integrated, and difficult to interpret, limiting support for multimodal clinical workflows. We developed and evaluated EyeAgent for ophthalmic decision support. EyeAgent comprises three layers including 54 task-specific EyeTools, 32 clinical skills, and a modular large language model reasoning core with interchangeable backbones. A multi-level evaluation distinguished this scope from empirical system-level validation. Component-level evaluation assessed newly developed models on held-out splits of datasets totaling 871,862 samples. System-level evaluation included illustrative cases of workflow breadth, a 200-case expert-rating study of output quality, and an exploratory multicenter reader study comparing unassisted and EyeAgent-assisted performance among 27 ophthalmologists from 11 centers. Skill-level and backbone ablations further assessed orchestration and robustness. In illustrative cases, EyeAgent showed task-specific advantages over GPT-5.5 in lesion quantitation, cross-modality synthesis, and uncertainty-aware reporting. In the expert-rating study, EyeAgent achieved an F1 score of 0.84 for skill selection, with 82.7%-92.0% of outputs rated acceptable or better across six clinical dimensions. In the exploratory multicenter reader study, diagnostic accuracy increased from 72.8% unassisted to 91.9% assisted (difference, 19.1 percentage points (pp); 95% CI, 13.6-24.7; Holm-adjusted P<0.001). Report completeness increased from 55.8% to 75.6% (difference, 19.8 pp; 95% CI, 14.8-24.7; Holm-adjusted P<0.001). Across the evaluated settings, EyeAgent supported interpretable, evidence-guided reasoning and showed potential for human-AI collaboration. Broader real-world effectiveness and generalizability require prospective and cross-population validation.

cs.HC

版本更新 · v6arXiv:2412.04629

Reducing Confirmation Bias on Controversial Issues through LLM-Generated Multi-Persona Debates

Li Shi, Houjiang Liu, Yian Wong, Utkarsh Mujumdar, Dan Zhang, Jacek Gwizdka, Matthew Lease

原文摘要

Multi-persona debate systems powered by large language models (LLMs) show promise in reducing confirmation bias; however, empirical evidence remains limited. Through a within-subjects experiment, we compared an LLM-generated multi-persona debate system with an opposing-stances retrieval system. We evaluated system effectiveness in mitigating confirmation bias over 312 study trials across 8 controversial topics, using behavioral measures (changes in eye-fixation patterns) and attitudinal measures (shifts between pre/post-intervention beliefs), with topic familiarity and cognitive tendencies as moderators. Our results show that: (i) participants allocated more than half of their visual attention to attitude-inconsistent content in both systems, with no significant between-system differences; (ii) the debate system showed a suggestive but statistically non-significant buffering pattern among participants with stronger cognitive tendencies, and topic familiarity did not significantly moderate its effect on visual attention; and (iii) reading effort and perceived argument quality influenced participants' engagement with attitude-inconsistent content. These findings suggest that multi-persona debate systems can support engagement with diverse viewpoints, while their comparative advantage over opposing-stances retrieval was not established; individual cognitive tendencies remained an important predictor of visual attention. We provide further implications for designing multi-persona debates to better mitigate confirmation bias, focusing on balancing facts and persuasion and on deciding when to explore diverse viewpoints versus offer concrete solutions.

cs.HC · cs.CY · cs.IR