跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 02:35 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 02:36 — 2026-11-15 02:36(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 02:35最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 02:34(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14018

Interleaving anatomical inspection and diagnostic reasoning for explainable radiology report generation

Chentao Huang, Runlong Lin, Zhijun Wang, Yunxiang Li, Yuanyuan Sun, Jian Wang, Hongfei Lin, Ling Luo

原文摘要

Automated radiology report generation can draft clinically plausible reports, yet the pathway from visual evidence to reported findings remains opaque, leaving the diagnostic basis of these reports unexplained and the generated reports difficult to review or revise. We introduce ARIVE (Anatomy-guided Reasoning with Interleaved Visual Evidence), an explainable report generation framework that interleaves anatomical inspection with diagnostic reasoning prior to final report composition. To support this process, we constructed 159,416 multimodal chain-of-thought (MCoT) trajectories from MIMIC-CXR, wherein visual evidence from inspected anatomical regions informs subsequent clinical interpretation. Trained on these trajectories and further optimized using anatomical and clinical-content rewards, ARIVE achieved superior clinical-efficacy performance compared with strong baselines on MIMIC-CXR and the abnormality-centered MIMIC-ABN. ARIVE's reports were competitive with those of leading models in blinded expert grading, and its MCoT trajectories earned high ratings for diagnostic traceability. Furthermore, a paired review evaluation suggests that access to MCoT can aid in identifying errors within generated reports.

cs.CV · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14571

MechFoundry: An agentic loop that poses and performs engineering analyses and optimization of real-world objects

Xue-Ling Luo, Marco Conte, Peter Yichen Chen, Nikolaos Bouklas

原文摘要

AI agents can automate software engineering because a compiler or a test suite checks that the code does what the user or the agent intended. In engineering analysis, however, the steps that precede the computation have few easily verifiable checks: modeling a design or an object, deciding how it is used, where supports and loads are applied, and what material each part is made of. A human expert therefore makes these decisions, carries out the steps, and judges the result, one object at a time. We present MechFoundry, an agentic loop coupled with bespoke software that automates structural analyses of real-world objects without a human in the loop. From an object's lexical description, it generates a shape, poses a loading case relevant to how the object is used, assigns a material to each part, solves the nonlinear structural response, and improves the design against the loads it carries. A differentiable GPU solver built on an adaptive octree that need not conform to the surface enables the transition from shape generation to simulation and optimization. Across 50 everyday and engineering objects, the agent posed and solved a loading case in 6.5 minutes and for US$1.3 per object on average. Without a test suite to check against, we had language-model reviewers grade each session, as a first indication of where the agent's engineering judgment holds and where it fails.

cs.CE · cs.AI

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1228ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Benchmarking Egocentric Clinical Intent Understanding Capability for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models

Shaonan Liu Shenzhen University, Guo Yu, Xiaoling Luo Shenzhen University, Shiyi Zheng, Jie Liu City University of Hong Kong, Wenting Chen, Linlin Shen Shenzhen University

原文摘要

Medical Multimodal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) require egocentric clinical intent understanding for real-world deployment, yet existing benchmarks fail to evaluate this critical capability. We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation. Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical workflows, and implicit adherence to safety protocols. We propose a Three-Dimensional Clinical Intent Framework evaluating: (1) Spatial Intent—discriminating precise targets amid visual noise, (2) Temporal Intent—inferring causal rationale through retrospective and prospective reasoning, and (3) Standard Intent—verifying protocol compliance through safety checks. Beyond accuracy metrics, we introduce Trap QA mechanisms to stress-test clinical reliability by penalizing hallucinations and cognitive sycophancy. Experiments reveal current MLLMs struggle with egocentric intent due to over-reliance on global features, leading to fabricated observations and uncritical acceptance of invalid instructions.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表