跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 07:45 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 08:35 — 2026-11-15 08:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 07:45最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 07:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14856

Honest Fusion Evaluation for Cross-Domain Deepfake Detection: Leakage Audits and Tail Robustness

Luke Collins, Chang-Tsun Li, Duc Thanh Nguyen

原文摘要

Cross-domain video deepfake detection increasingly uses frozen foundation-model experts, combined by calibrated score averaging, a per-video router picking one expert, or a learned head over concatenated features. Expressive routing and feature fusion are often reported to beat plain averaging. Across a 22-dataset frozen-expert testbed, we find those gains are largely evaluation artifacts. A corner theorem locates the gap routing aims to close: because AUC depends only on score ordering, the best any score-space router can do is an oracle reading the test label to pick each video's expert, a ceiling no realisable, label-blind router reaches. The theorem does not order real routers against a calibrated global average; the case against routing is empirical, and no router we test beats that average. Feature fusion reads raw features, falls outside the theorem, and is audited empirically. Reported gains trace to leakage: holding out one dataset leaks siblings sharing identities and reals (over-crediting routing), while holding out one manipulation keeps that dataset's reals in training (over-crediting feature fusion). A $2\times 2$ over fold and evaluation granularity pins the $+2.6$pp feature-fusion "win" to the fold alone: 12/12 significant under leaky folds vs. 0/12 under honest family-held-out folds, where both gains vanish. Fusion still pays off in the tail of hard videos and families: as experts are added, videos every expert misclassifies drop from 15.2% to 2.3%, and global calibrated fusion (InvB) beats the best single expert on worst-family AUC, selective risk (AURC), and low-false-positive recall, stably across protocols. Practitioners should calibrate and combine globally, hold out whole dataset families, and measure tail performance. For score-space routing under ranking metrics, honest evaluation and expert diversity matter more than combiner complexity.

cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14851

Paired Geometric Supervision for Generalizable Deepfake Detection

Luke Collins, Chang-Tsun Li, Duc Thanh Nguyen, Victor Sanchez

原文摘要

We present OrthoPairGTL, a geometric training framework for cross-domain deepfake detection, built on a partially frozen DINOv3 backbone ($\sim$300M parameters), and make three contributions: (1) We re-evaluate six recent transfer-learning detectors (Forensics Adapter, Effort, three GenD variants and FakeSTormer) using the authors' released checkpoints under a single preprocessing pipeline across 17 cross-domain datasets (2018-2025), so that the reported gaps reflect method rather than per-method pipeline tuning. (2) We model the transformation between paired real and fake samples, training Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) adapters with an orthogonal pair decomposition, hyperspherical regularisation, and (in the GSD-LoRA variant) a set-level coherence objective. (3) Under LoRA, this regularisation gives a more stable optimisation profile: GSD-LoRA's post-peak validation degradation is $4.2\times$ shallower than plain LoRA at the same parameter footprint, and the time-averaged validation AUC across training is 1.82 pp higher. On the 17 datasets, GSD-LoRA matches or exceeds every re-evaluated baseline (92.82% vs. 91.58% for the strongest; paired Wilcoxon signed-rank $p=0.015$, 13/17 per-dataset wins), with the largest gains on modern reenactment-heavy benchmarks (DSv1.1, DSv2). Under strict parameter budgets, LayerNorm-only tuning ($\approx$0.03% of the backbone) is the most stable configuration and matches the strongest baseline with a mean of 91.97%.

cs.CV