跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 08:47 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 08:52 — 2026-11-15 08:52(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 08:47最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 08:46(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.24712

Vibenix: Agentic Software Packaging and Maintenance with Nix

Martim Monis, Martin Schwaighofer, Nuno Saavedra, Alexandra Mendes, Rene Mayrhofer, João F. Ferreira

原文摘要

Implicit dependencies, uncontrolled network access, and other build-environment impurities create intransparent software supply chains. Identifying every dependency affecting a build is a difficult task. Functional package management addresses this through reproducible packaging, ensuring software relies exclusively on declared, hermetically isolated inputs. However, creating build recipes remains complex and time-consuming, posing a significant barrier to adoption for developers and maintainers. We present Vibenix, an open-source AI-powered agent that bridges this gap by automatically generating Nix packaging expressions. Vibenix uses a large language model (LLM) to iteratively refine recipes through a rule-guided build-repair feedback loop. On 466 packaging tasks from our new NixBench dataset, Vibenix produced buildable packages in 95.3% of cases using Claude Haiku 4.5, compared with 5.6% for a state-of-the-art LLM-based single-shot packaging tool. Manual validation of 100 packages revealed that 47% of the buildable packages were initially functionally correct; a post-build refinement process based on the evaluator-optimizer pattern increased functional correctness by 35 percentage points. On our new NixBench-Repair dataset of package maintenance tasks, Vibenix achieved an 87.6% success rate. These results demonstrate how unreliable LLMs can generate rigorously defined, complete, auditable dependency trees for real-world software, reducing maintainer burden while providing a trustworthy foundation for secure software distribution.

cs.SE