跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 03:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 04:13 — 2026-11-15 04:13(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 03:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 03:36(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08672

Real-World Adoption, Use, and Governance of an LLM-Based Electronic Health Record Search and Synthesis Platform

Jiunn-Tyng Yeh, Michael Gao, Marshall Nichols, Anika Mohan, Tareq Aljurf, Michael Revoir, Matthew Gardner, Bradley Hintze 等 11 位作者

原文摘要

We evaluated the longitudinal adoption and use of Scout, an electronic health record-integrated large language model platform that provides cited search and synthesis of patient records, during staged deployment across a multi-hospital academic health system. Over 11 months, 2,635 users completed 80,465 tasks. 1,768 clinical users initiated use within the first 29 days of system-wide launch, which included a required training. Daily initiation increased 21.2-fold at launch, from 2.9 to 61.0 users per day. Of the 495 users who initiated use during the launch week, 310 did so in the first two days. Use spanned more than 20 recorded specialty categories, five care-practitioner roles, and 46,485 distinct prompts involving retrieval, synthesis, extraction, evaluation, and drafting, with 752 tasks saved for reuse. Among care practitioners who completed the required course, 77.9% went on to use Scout, with a median of 1.7 days after course completion. The highest-intensity user quintile accounted for 59.0% of tasks and 61.9% of tokens. Exploratory prompt analysis showed use across retrieval, synthesis, extraction, evaluation, and note-drafting. These findings suggest that rapid, broad adoption requires clinician-led task design and evaluation, traceable governance proportional to reach, centralized capacity planning and user support, and training integrated with access.

cs.CY

版本更新 · v4arXiv:2406.08375

Methods for Accelerating and Stabilizing Nonlinear Magnetic Equivalent-Circuit Analysis

Danial Kazemikia, Matthew Gardner

原文摘要

Design and optimization of electromagnetic devices require models that converge reliably and quickly and can represent intense localized magnetic saturation. This paper presents a parameterized 2D nonlinear magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) and proposes solution methods for it: an approximate Jacobian that is symmetric positive definite, so each Newton-Raphson iteration can use sparse Cholesky factorization with fill-reducing reordering, and Anderson mixing as step control. These methods are compared with alternative nonlinear iterations, linear solvers, and step-control methods in convergence, computational cost, and prediction accuracy. Radial-flux magnetic gears (RFMGs) with structural bridges serve as a challenging test case, because their thin bridges exhibit intense local saturation. The methods are evaluated on three bridged base designs and on 1,024 bridged designs, each paired with the same design without the bridge. On the base designs, Newton-Raphson iteration with the approximate Jacobian reached much lower residuals than fixed-point iteration, which converged for none of them. Sparse Cholesky factorization with reordering was the fastest linear solver tested. Across the 1,024 design pairs, full-step Newton-Raphson converged for 193 bridged and 564 bridge-free designs, whereas Anderson mixing converged for 1,003 and 1,022 and required fewer iterations. Bridged designs converged less often and more slowly under every method. The nonlinear MEC was 2.17 and 1.84 times faster than fixed-mesh nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) in total computation time for the bridged and bridge-free populations. The median outer-rotor torque discrepancy relative to FEA was 0.22%, and the Spearman rank correlations of the design rankings were at least 0.9996.

eess.SY · cs.CE