论文库

Neural surrogates for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are trained and ranked on datasets that each vary one design family in one flow domain. Such datasets cannot test the least that an aerodynamic foundation model must do: predict CFD-quality incompressible flow in seconds for new shapes in new enclosures. On DrivAerML, larger models and longer training barely lower Transolver's error; doubling the training cases cuts it by about 12% up to 400 cases, exhausting the dataset. We introduce AeroZoo, a benchmark and training corpus of 3,815 time-mean solutions to the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) equations with a transition model, across seven geometry families, eight enclosure configurations and Reynolds numbers from $10^3$ to $10^8$. Each sample poses a well-posed PDE problem in the form a solver receives it: the boundary meshes grouped by condition type, the prescribed values and the fluid properties. The 2,816 samples with a stable time mean form the canonical benchmark: two tasks, engineering metrics and 22 frozen splits, disjoint in geometry, that hold out geometry families, enclosures, boundary-condition layouts and Reynolds ranges. On the random split, boundary-condition tokens cut GeoTransolver's median velocity error from 76.9% to 8.4% of the inlet speed in single-seed runs (uniform inlet flow: 11.0%). ISLA, a transformer for boundary-driven PDEs, reaches 5.3% over four seeds, about 4 times the change from a finer mesh. On the same test samples, a held-out geometry family barely changes ISLA's error relative to uniform flow, and a held-out enclosure or boundary-condition layout raises it 2.4 to 9.2 times. The data and the scoring code will be released.