论文库

原文摘要

Speech recognition (ASR) systems are usually compared by word error rate (WER) on recorded files, after punctuation, capital letters and number format are removed. In dictation, the audio is streamed live and the text goes into the user's message as written, so what matters is which mistakes the user has to fix. The test set, streamed to eleven ASR systems, comprises 106 scripted English dictations from one speaker (read in a quiet room, with a fan on, and whispered), 20 clips in each of eleven other language and dialect sets, and 400 recordings that join clips in two languages. Every error was sorted by a fixed rule into four levels: recognition, output formatting, language handling and, for the self-hosted models, audio dropped before the model. Systems with similar WER failed in different ways. Zoom Scribe and OpenAI's GPT-Live-Transcribe have almost the same WER on quiet English (7.4% and 7.3%), but 34.7% and 8.8% on whispered English. Zoom and both AssemblyAI models left out 26-28% of whispered words, and still 21-26% with their end-of-turn detection relaxed or off; seven other systems left out at most 3%. Qwen3-ASR's 32% came from the speech detection in our own deployment (6% when relaxed). Across 107 EARS speakers, the same four systems lost 7-31% of whispered words, while six others lost under 2%. With only English selected, Gemini, Deepgram and our self-hosted Whisper lost the non-English part of a two-language recording in 86-99% of recordings, against 33-46% with both languages selected, while GPT-Live-Transcribe, OpenAI's realtime Whisper and Meta lost it in at most 20%. Running Whisper behind a Silero voice activity detector that drops audio judged to be silence raised whispered WER from 10.1% to 51.4%. Most English results come from one read speaker. The code, the recordings, both references and every transcript are released.