跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文，按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-15 02:35 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 03:26 — 2026-11-15 03:26（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-15 02:35最近发现新增版本：2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 5 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 02:34（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12478

AuDiR: Diagnosing Audio Reasoning with Rule and Percept Interventions

Chengwei Wei, Yi Ma, Nancy F. Chen

原文摘要

Answer accuracy alone does not distinguish failures in acoustic perception, rule knowledge, and rule application. AuDiR (Audio Diagnostic Reasoning) examines these distinctions through controlled input interventions. Each item contains an audio clip, a multiple-choice question, a task-general rule, and a textual description of the acoustic observations needed to answer. Three conditions progressively supply the rule and observations; a fourth removes the audio while retaining the question and rule. The first correct diagnostic condition assigns an operational response label, without identifying a unique internal cause. The current benchmark contains 201 items in 18 families drawn from 9 sources, with answer references documented separately from percept extraction. In a preliminary evaluation of Gemini-3.8-flash, accuracy is 29.3% without supplied information, 31.3% with the rule, and 98.5% with the observations also supplied. No-audio accuracy is 23.9%, with a confidence interval containing the 25.0% chance rate. A family-level knowledge probe associates incomplete rule recall with larger gains from rule provision. These results show the benefit of supplying acoustic observations as text, while incomplete validation, possible recognition shortcuts, and non-monotonic responses limit stronger failure-attribution claims.

cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2602.08351

Rethinking Bayesian Optimization for Co-Optimizing LLM Training Configurations

Zhiliang Chen, Alfred Wei Lun Leong, Shao Yong Ong, Apivich Hemachandra, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. Chen 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Fine-tuning an LLM to maximize performance on a downstream task requires finding the optimal data and model configuration. This is a black-box optimization problem that Bayesian optimization (BO) addresses by sequentially evaluating training configurations and using observed performance feedback to adaptively guide the search towards better configurations. However, directly applying BO to the joint data-model space suffers from two fundamental challenges: the prohibitive cost of full LLM training at each iteration, and the large number of BO iterations required for effective exploration due to the high problem dimensionality. This paper introduces JoBS, a BO-based approach that co-optimizes data and model configurations without requiring a full training run at every iteration. JoBS allocates an initial portion of the optimization budget to learn a scaling-law-inspired performance predictor that estimates fully trained LLM performance from only a small number of training steps. The remaining budget is then used to run BO with this predictor, eliminating the need for full training runs and enabling JoBS to explore significantly more data and model configurations within the same budget. We analyze JoBS's average regret and derive the optimal budget allocation between predictor learning and BO iterations. Empirically, JoBS outperforms independent data and model optimization methods and existing multi-fidelity BO baselines across a diverse set of downstream tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/chenzhiliang94/BO-for-LLMs.

cs.LG · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1127ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment

Bryan Chen Zhengyu Tan, Zhengyuan Liu Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Xiaoyuan Yi Microsoft Research, Jing Yao Microsoft, Xing Xie Microsoft Research Asia, Nancy F. Chen A*STAR, Roy Ka-Wei Lee Singapore University of Technology and Design

原文摘要

Despite their global prevalence, many Large Language Models (LLMs) are aligned to a monolithic, often Western-centric set of values. This paper investigates the more challenging task of fine-grained value alignment: examining whether LLMs can emulate the distinct cultural values of demographic subgroups. Using Singapore as a case study and the World Values Survey (WVS), we examine the value landscape and show that even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4.1 achieve only 57.4% accuracy in predicting subgroup modal preferences. We construct a dataset of over 20,000 samples to train and evaluate a range of models. We demonstrate that simple fine-tuning on structured numerical preferences yields substantial gains, improving accuracy on unseen, out-of-distribution subgroups by an average of 17.4%. These gains partially transfer to open-ended generation. However, we find significant pre-existing performance biases, where models better emulate young, male, Chinese, and Christian personas. Furthermore, while fine-tuning improves average performance, it widens the disparity between subgroups when measured by distance-aware metrics. Our work offers insights into the limits and fairness implications of subgroup-level cultural alignment.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2028ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Programming over Thinking: Efficient and Robust Multi-Constraint Planning

Derrick Goh Xin Deik Nanyang Technological University, Quanyu Long, Zhengyuan Liu Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Nancy F. Chen A*STAR, Wenya Wang Nanyang Technological University

原文摘要

Multi-constraint planning involves identifying, evaluating, and refining candidate plans while satisfying multiple, potentially conflicting constraints. Existing large language model (LLM) approaches face fundamental limitations in this domain. Pure reasoning paradigms, which rely on long natural language chains, are prone to inconsistency, error accumulation, and prohibitive cost as constraints compound. Conversely, LLMs combined with coding- or solver-based strategies lack flexibility: they often generate problem-specific code from scratch or depend on fixed solvers, failing to capture generalizable logic across diverse problems.To alleviate these issues, we introduce the Scalable Code Planning Engine (SCOPE), a systematic framework that disentangles query-specific problem reasoning from generic code execution. SCOPE first transforms input queries into optimized structured representations, capturing the interdependent constraints, and then autonomously generates reusable solver functions (Combination, Filter, and Deliver) that provide consistent and reliable execution across diverse problems. SCOPE achieves state-of-the-art performance while lowering cost and latency. For example, with GPT-4o, it reaches 93.1% success on TravelPlanner, a 61.6% gain over the best baseline (CoT) while cutting inference cost by 1.4 times and time by approximately 4.67 times. Code is available at https://github.com/DerrickGXD/SCOPE.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.989ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

MMAC: A Multilingual, Multimodal Alignment Framework for Cultural Grounding Evaluation

Weihua Zheng, Zhengyuan Liu Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Tanmoy Chakraborty Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Weiwen Xu Alibaba Group, Xiaoxue Gao, Bryan Chen Zhengyu Tan, Bowei Zou A*STAR, Chang Liu Shanghai University of Finance and Economics 等 35 位作者

原文摘要

The global deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) underscores the urgent need to evaluate their cultural alignment. However, assessing genuine “cultural awareness” across modalities (text, vision, speech) and languages remains a significant challenge. To comprehensively investigate this domain, we propose MMAC, a systematic framework that encompasses a tri-modally aligned cultural benchmark creation pipeline and a five-dimensional evaluation protocol to assess cross-country awareness disparities, evaluate cross-lingual and cross-modal consistency, and verify cultural knowledge generalization and grounding validity. Given the prevailing Western cultural bias in current models, we focus on 8 Asian countries as our dataset foundation to more acutely reveal potential cultural deficiencies in LLMs. Our dataset, MMAC-bench, features 27,000 human-curated questions across 10 languages. Crucially, it is the first dataset aligned at the input level across text, image, and speech, enabling direct cross-modal transfer tests. Each question consists of multiple-choice options accompanied by open-ended generated explanations, where 79% require multi-step reasoning grounded in cultural context, moving beyond simple memorization. We probe the causes of modal divergence, offering insights into fostering culturally robust MLLMs.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表