跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 01:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 02:13 — 2026-11-15 02:13(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 01:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 01:32(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15456

Bet Imaginatively, not Historically in Independent-Data Sequential Testing

Nathaniel Xu, Feng Liu, Danica J. Sutherland

原文摘要

Sequential testing avoids some of the many controversies and drawbacks related to traditional batch testing with p-values. In particular, the testing by betting paradigm has developed rapidly in recent years; it frames the level of evidence against the null as the wealth of a player in a betting game. Naturally, how much a player should bet is a key consideration, and should reflect their confidence in what they know about the next observed data point. Much current work uses standard betting strategies developed for adversarial problems. In the stochastic setting, where the observed data is independent and stationary, these approaches may be suboptimal. We propose a simple betting strategy, follow the leave-one-out e-power (FLOE), that exploits the i.i.d. nature of a data stream to estimate the e-power of our current test on the underlying distribution. We average not over the historical evidence collected so far, as generic online learning-based methods do, but instead over the equally-likely possible data sequences we might have seen based on shuffling the data. With an additional principled regularization technique, this simple drop-in method yields substantial improvements in testing performance on a variety of kernel two-sample and independence testing problems.

stat.ML · cs.LG