跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 05:32 — 2026-11-16 05:32(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.33932

FastSAR: Open-Source SAR Image Formation on CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs, and a Matched Comparison of Algorithms, Precisions, and Processors

Paul Singerman, Tom Braun

原文摘要

The number of spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) collectors is growing exponentially, each returning raw collections that must be formed into images. Exact backprojection needs 1.6 trillion interpolated reads and 90 trillion floating-point operations for a 108-megapixel Umbra image. How long it takes to form an image, and at what price, depends on the algorithm, the arithmetic, and the hardware. Open-source implementations have never been compared on matched hardware against a common reference, and none run on Google tensor processing units (TPUs). This paper presents FastSAR, an open-source SAR image formation library for central processing units (CPUs), NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs), and TPUs. With it, we compare three SAR image formation algorithms, four floating-point formats, and six cloud devices in every supported combination, with cost per image at on-demand cloud prices as the fair common measure. FastSAR is 1.06 to 22,000 times faster than the tested open-source implementations at equal or better accuracy, and the full suite of hardware, algorithm, and floating-point combinations lets a user choose the Pareto-optimal configuration for their balance of accuracy, speed, and cost. The L4 GPU forms images the cheapest overall. Larger GPUs are faster but cost more per image because their price rises faster than their speed. The TPUs come close to the GPUs in cost, but only for the factorized algorithm, and the CPU is far less efficient in both speed and cost. Lower precision formats buy less of a speedup than expected, and each step down in precision costs accuracy.

cs.PF · eess.SP