跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 07:45 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 07:48 — 2026-11-15 07:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 07:45最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 07:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08634

Benchmarking Machine Learning for Chaotic Three-Body Dynamics in Astrophysics

Sheng Wan, Pavan Vynatheya, Duo Xu, Li Kevin Wenliang, Ye Zhu

原文摘要

Machine learning (ML) and generative AI have recently made impressive progress in understanding physics. We explore a hierarchy of prediction problems stemming from chaotic three-body systems and benchmark existing ML approaches, including general-purpose prediction algorithms and those that build on top of foundational physics models. We first simulate the trajectories of triple systems near the critical boundary of stable/unstable initial conditions. We then design a hierarchy of learning tasks, focusing mainly on two broad problems: stability prediction and trajectory prediction. The former classifies whether a given triple system has diverged or not up to a specific horizon, while the latter predicts the exact trajectory, both given suitable input features. We benchmark a range of ML approaches, from simple regression methods to state-of-the-art foundational physics models, across these tasks, and compare them against astrophysical methods such as the Mardling-Aarseth stability criterion. Our experiments reveal a clear order of task difficulties in chaotic three-body dynamics: early dynamics enable strong stability prediction, while precise long-horizon trajectory forecasting remains difficult. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/Simonwan03/ThreeBodyMLBench.

cs.LG