跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 01:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 02:25 — 2026-11-15 02:25(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 01:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 01:32(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15609

GLCR: Global-Local Collaborative Routing for Multi-Task Electromagnetic Signal Processing

Fang Lu, Yao Lu, Zhuangzhi Chen, Sicheng Zhang, Shanqing Yu, Yun Lin, Qi Xuan, Guan Gui

原文摘要

Deep neural networks for electromagnetic signal processing are typically developed as single-task experts with fixed inputs and objectives, limiting cross-task transferability. Electromagnetic foundation models offer broader task coverage but incur substantial pretraining and inference costs. To balance accuracy and efficiency, we adopt model routing to dynamically dispatch unknown signals to matched experts within a heterogeneous pool. We construct HeteroSignal-7, a multi-task routing benchmark with 140,000 samples from seven datasets covering six task types, paired with seven classification and waveform-recovery experts and a unified evaluation protocol. We then propose GLCR, a two-stage routing method combining global dispatch with local discrimination of similar tasks. First, a lightweight one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) with an additive-margin head predicts one of seven routing classes. Second, a gradient-boosted-tree specialist uses four physical statistics to re-evaluate samples whose top two candidates match a confusion pair automatically identified from validation errors. The pipeline is trained across the full signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) range and requires neither SNR labels nor noise estimation at inference time. GLCR outperforms all 19 baselines, achieving 96.16% routing accuracy and a 76.30% system score, exceeding the respective second-best baselines by 1.16% and 1.14%. It achieves the lowest routing latency among the compared methods at 1.43 ms per sample and reduces expected overall system FLOPs by 5.9 times compared with executing all experts. This work provides a public evaluation platform and an efficient, reproducible baseline for heterogeneous expert routing in electromagnetic signal processing.

cs.LG