跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 10:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 12:46 — 2026-11-15 12:46(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 10:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 10:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14846

Open Challenges and Opportunities in Human-Agent Systems

Reuth Mirsky, Sarath Sreedharan, Nitay Alon, Stefan Sarkadi, Munindar P. Singh, Liz Sonenberg, Peter Stone, Silvia Tulli 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

Agentic AI systems increasingly undertake extended tasks and act on people's behalf, making human-agent interaction central to their effectiveness. Successful interaction requires understanding human perspectives, coordinating complementary capabilities, and maintaining productive relationships within socio-technical environments. This paper examines how foundations developed by the Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS) community inform these demands. We consider interactions ranging from individual human-agent partnerships to teams and larger groups, where participants differ in their roles, decision authority, capabilities, and objectives. We organize computational approaches around the connected challenges of understanding others and deciding how to interact with them. Theory of Mind, belief-desire-intention architectures, goal and plan recognition, inverse planning, and recursive reasoning provide mechanisms for representing and inferring partially observable mental states. Observer-aware planning, model reconciliation, and decision-theoretic communication connect these inferences to action, explanation, and information exchange. Together with shared autonomy, argumentation, and cooperative inverse reinforcement learning, these approaches offer foundations for agentic systems that account for evolving human knowledge, intentions, and expectations. We argue that progress requires treating human interaction as an ongoing decision problem shaped by uncertainty, interdependence, and potentially conflicting objectives.

cs.AI · cs.MA

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2506.22276

Artificial Intelligent Disobedience: Rethinking the Agency of Our Artificial Teammates

Reuth Mirsky

原文摘要

Artificial intelligence has made remarkable strides in recent years, achieving superhuman performance across a wide range of tasks. Yet despite these advances, most cooperative AI systems remain rigidly obedient, designed to follow human instructions without question and conform to user expectations, even when doing so may be counterproductive or unsafe. This paper argues for expanding the agency of AI teammates to include \textit{intelligent disobedience}, empowering them to make meaningful and autonomous contributions within human-AI teams. It introduces a scale of AI agency levels and uses representative examples to highlight the importance and growing necessity of treating AI autonomy as an independent research focus in cooperative settings. The paper then explores how intelligent disobedience manifests across different autonomy levels and concludes by proposing initial boundaries and considerations for studying disobedience as a core capability of artificial agents.

cs.AI