跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 01:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:51 — 2026-11-15 01:51(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 01:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 01:32(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2510.11954

VizCopilot: Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Enterprise Chatbots with Context Visualization

Sam Yu-Te Lee, Jingya Chen, Albert Calzaretto, Richard Lee, Samir Passi, Alice Ferng, Mihaela Vorvoreanu

原文摘要

Enterprise AI chatbots show promise in supporting knowledge workers in information synthesis tasks by retrieving context from large, heterogeneous databases before generating answers. However, when the retrieved context misaligns with user intentions, these chatbots often produce ``irrelevantly right'' responses that raise the risk of overreliance. To foster appropriate reliance, we need a different approach than asking users to verify chatbot outputs. We posit that human oversight and modification of the context retrieval process can improve the quality of chatbots' outputs and users' awareness, resulting in more appropriate reliance and higher accountability. In this work, we explore this approach through a Research-through-Design study using VizCopilot, a chatbot extended with corpus visualization techniques. Through a within-subject study comparing VizCopilot and a simplified pure-text chatbot, we evaluate the role of visualization in enterprise chatbots and surface future design opportunities for fostering appropriate reliance through context engineering. Our findings show that visualization not only helps users detect and correct misaligned context, but also enhances user agency and system transparency. At the same time, the study reveals limitations regarding verification support and trust in AI summaries. Based on these findings, we discuss how visualization can foster appropriate reliance, the associated design trade-offs, and our vision towards transparent and sustainable human-AI interaction.

cs.HC

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2610.05108

Best-of-$N$ Guidance for Test-time Diffusion Alignment

Richard Lee Kim, Yeongmin Kim, Gyuwon Sim, Taekyu Kim, Minsang Park, Il-chul Moon

原文摘要

Diffusion models achieve strong generative performance but often struggle to align generated samples with human preferences measured by a reward model. A simple yet effective algorithm for test-time alignment is Best-of-$N$ (BoN) sampling, which draws $N$ i.i.d. samples from a pre-trained diffusion model and outputs the single highest-reward sample. Despite its empirical success, BoN makes limited use of reward information, as it is incorporated only at the final selection stage without influencing the reverse diffusion trajectory during sampling. Consequently, BoN sampling does not improve the average alignment of generated samples and is primarily suited to single-output settings. We propose Best-of-$N$ Guidance (BoNG), a novel method that integrates the principle of BoN sampling directly into the reverse diffusion process. BoNG performs online BoN selection over denoising particles and adjusts the reverse diffusion process to steer the particle population toward higher-reward regions during generation. Specifically, by introducing an asymmetric guidance interaction among denoising particles, BoNG uses the current BoN particle as a guidance signal to the rest of the particle population. This particle-level interaction reshapes the sampling process toward higher-reward regions, enabling BoNG to improve not only the final best sample beyond Vanilla BoN sampling, but also the average quality of generated samples. Over 36 empirical comparisons, BoNG achieves the best performance in 29 cases, ranking first in 80.56% of the comparisons against SMC and Vanilla BoN sampling. BoNG also supports multi-output capability, achieving 1.3$\times$ ImageReward score of the latest sample-based guidance method with a 1.6$\times$ speedup. We release the code at https://github.com/aailab-kaist/BoNG.

cs.LG · cs.AI