跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 03:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 03:48 — 2026-11-15 03:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 03:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 03:36(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13732

CIALLO: Learning Shared Intent Representations for Cross-Embodiment Manipulation

Choo Sin Wai, Dake Zhong, Jingye Zhang, Zhifang Liu, Siyao Xiao, Zirong Ding, Yuhong Zhang, Kangjie Chen 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Robot demonstrations contain reusable manipulation knowledge, but transferring this knowledge across embodiments requires representations that bridge differences in control interfaces. Action reconstruction alone does not ensure that similar behaviors across robots share a representation. To address this gap, we introduce CIALLO, an action codec that aligns actions, visual changes, and observation-grounded language in a shared space of short-horizon behavioral intent. An embodiment-conditioned decoder maps this intent back to robot-specific actions, allowing a shared representation to support different control interfaces. After pretraining on eight embodiments, CIALLO adapts to a new robot from one recording of at most 10 seconds by updating only its embodiment embeddings. The calibrated codec then remains frozen while a policy learns to predict intent from observations and instructions. We instantiate this policy with Qwen3.5-4B to form Qwen-CIALLO, whose backbone requires no large-scale robot-action pretraining before policy finetuning. With 20 demonstrations per task, Qwen-CIALLO achieves 76.7\% average success across real SO-101 and single-arm Piper robots, compared with 70.0\% for fully finetuned $π_0$. In simulation, we additionally finetune the action decoder, achieving 97.3\% success on LIBERO and 52.7\% on RoboTwin 2.0. The LIBERO policy also achieves 80.8\% on LIBERO-Plus without further finetuning. Together, these results support a shared action codec as a transferable control interface that separates embodiment calibration from task learning.

cs.RO

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12353

QCC-WM: Linking Macro-State Dynamics and Visual Generation via Quotient Causal Construction

Zhizhong Fu, Wei Zhou, Zhaoyang Jiang, Yudong Lin, Songlun Li, Zhi Li, Feifan Chen, Gaoming Li 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

A key challenge in action-conditioned world modeling is to construct macro-states from high-dimensional observations that support recursive prediction under actions, while keeping their predicted evolution consistent with visual changes in generated observations. We propose QCC-WM, a visual world model based on Quotient-based Causal Construction. QCC-WM uses action responses to guide macro-variable construction for recursive action-conditioned prediction. A shared reference quotient measurement constrains the consistency between predicted states and observed changes, allowing macro-level predictions to provide structured constraints for future visual generation. Using translational and rotational actions and their predicted responses, the model aggregates local visual features into macro-nodes with spatial correspondence through causal abstraction, and recursively predicts node content and motion under a shared reference measurement. Macro-level predictions guide future observation generation, while predicted motion transports historical appearance information. Node-level errors between generated observations and macro-level targets are then mapped back to the corresponding spatial regions for correction, improving consistency between visual generation and macro-level predictions. On the US-VLA dataset, QCC-WM achieves an ROI-MSE of 0.01861 for four-step prediction. Compared with the best baseline at each prediction horizon, it reduces LPIPS by 48.59%, 41.68%, and 30.23% for four-step prediction and eight- and sixteen-step recursive extrapolation, respectively. Ablation studies and mechanism analyses show that motion-guided reference transport mainly improves pixel reconstruction, while node-level error feedback further improves perceptual quality and consistency between generated observations and macro-level predictions.

cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11510

Reaching Is Not Finding: Map-Anchored Visual Prompting for the Last Mile of Aerial Vision-Language Navigation

Ningbo Li, Kebin Liu, Jingcan Chen, Weichen Zhang, Rong Ding, Yunhao Liu, Mo Li

原文摘要

Aerial vision-language navigation (VLN) asks a drone to find an object described in natural language. The description usually locates the object relative to named landmarks, such as streets and buildings. We observe that current navigators often bring the drone close to the target and then stop at the wrong place: they reach the target without finding it. This gap is shared by navigators of very different designs, from imitation learners to a fine-tuned 7B vision-language model. A simple test reveals the cause. When we replace the target object in the instruction with another one next to the same landmarks, no navigator goes to it, and most stop where they did before. Navigators learn to reach the landmarks, not to identify the described object. We therefore propose MAP-VP, a plug-and-play module for the last step. After any navigator stops, MAP-VP draws the landmarks named in the instruction onto the drone's current view, using the landmark outlines that the benchmark provides on a map. A fine-tuned 4B vision-language model then locates the target relative to these landmarks. The training data are generated automatically from the benchmark annotations. Neither drawing the landmarks nor fine-tuning helps much alone, but together they are highly effective. Without retraining any navigator, MAP-VP significantly improves all six navigators we test on CityNav. It roughly doubles the success rate of the two strongest trained navigators, raising HETT from 25.9% to 54.6% and FlightGPT from 24.2% to 48.9%, whereas CityNav's official detector-based last step adds less than two points to HETT.

cs.CV