跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 15:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 16:47 — 2026-11-15 16:47(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 15:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 15:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14849

Generalize Then Personalize: Wearable-Based Heart Rate Forecasting Under Scarce Ruck-March Data

Muntaqim Ahmed Raju, Ruizhe Ma, John W. Ramsay, David J. Cornell

原文摘要

Heart rate (HR) forecasting may provide advance information about near-future cardiovascular response, potentially supporting physiological monitoring and workload-management decisions during ruck marching. However, robust model development is constrained by the difficulty of collecting large-scale ruck-march datasets, creating a scarce-data problem in which models must generalize across participants while adapting to individuals from limited personal data. To address this problem, we benchmark population-only training (POT), personalized-from-scratch training (PFST), and population-pretrained fine-tuning (PPFT) for HR forecasting during loaded ruck marching using data from eight active-duty U.S. Army medics across thirteen sessions. LSTM, Attention-LSTM, and CNN-LSTM backbones were evaluated against a persistence baseline at 30 s and 60 s horizons. Across all neural architectures and horizons, PPFT yielded lower mean MAE, RMSE, and endpoint MAE than both POT and PFST. Participant-level paired analysis after averaging across three training seeds showed that, relative to PFST, PPFT reduced trajectory MAE by 2.22-4.30 bpm and endpoint MAE by 1.24-2.88 bpm. All six trajectory-MAE comparisons remained significant after Holm adjustment ($p_{adj}$ = 0.0469), while four of six endpoint-MAE comparisons remained significant after adjustment. At 30 s, persistence achieved the lowest MAE (3.555 $\pm$ 1.274 bpm), while CNN-LSTM PPFT achieved the lowest RMSE (4.669 $\pm$ 1.916 bpm); LSTM PPFT achieved the lowest endpoint MAE (5.093 $\pm$ 2.365 bpm). At 60 s, Attention-LSTM PPFT achieved the lowest MAE (5.573 $\pm$ 1.939 bpm) and RMSE (7.134 $\pm$ 2.260 bpm), while CNN-LSTM PPFT achieved the lowest endpoint MAE (7.553 $\pm$ 2.357 bpm). These results suggest that population pretraining followed by participant-specific fine-tuning may provide a practical strategy for scarce-data wearable HR forecasting.

cs.LG

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11733

Can the Remaining Answers Change the Prediction? Worst-Case Stability Checks for Personalized Rating Models

Priyanka Siddappa, Muntaqim Ahmed Raju, Shifat Haider Al Amin, Ruizhe Ma

原文摘要

Missing ratings can overturn a personalized model's current prediction. For completed models with additive response scores, exact worst case bounds check all missing assignments without changing the current predictor. We evaluate this audit retrospectively in two self-triage cohorts, 108 clinicians rating three simulated psychiatric interviews, and 126 counseling demonstrations annotated by ten experts. Under shared random half histories, Fisher adaptation based on observed ratings reduces log loss relative to response frequency by 0.1071 nats in the clinician audit (95% CI [0.0867,0.1261]) and 0.0223 in counseling (95% CI[0.0121,0.0321]). The counseling test excludes target experts and source videos from training. Certification covers 5.4% and 10.5% of targets; fixed width acquisition raises coverage to 13.7% and 28.6% at the same budgets. With weights and responses held fixed, the observed-rating update also has lower loss than an affine partial update while certifying exactly the same evaluated targets. The certificate establishes agreement with the completed model, not correctness or stability at intermediate updates. These rating tasks test the method; clinical usefulness remains untested.

cs.AI · stat.AP

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10348

Guided Co-Attention with Adaptive Gating for Multimodal Medical Data Fusion

Muntaqim Ahmed Raju, Priyanka Siddappa, Md Shifat Haider Al Amin, Ruizhe Ma, Md Ripon Ahammed

原文摘要

Multimodal fusion requires not only exchanging information across modalities but also determining which representations should participate in the interaction and how complementary cross-modal views should be combined. We introduce Guided Co-Attention with Adaptive Gating, a fusion framework that integrates token-wise guidance, bidirectional cross-attention, and sample-specific fusion. The proposed method constructs two directional representations: an image-conditioned text representation, obtained by allowing textual tokens to query visual features, and a text-conditioned image representation formed in the reverse direction. Token-wise guidance modulates the representations before cross-attention, while an adaptive gate learns the relative contribution of the two resulting directional representations for each sample. We evaluate the approach using paired chest radiographs and radiology reports as an image-text test bed for binary (normal vs. abnormal) classification. The two cross-attention directions exhibit distinct performance characteristics, demonstrating that reversing the query and source modalities does not produce interchangeable representations. Ablation experiments further show that bidirectional interaction, adaptive gating, and token guidance provide complementary benefits. The proposed model achieves 96.05% accuracy, 96.10% F1-score, 98.37% AUC, 95.60% Sens@95Spec, and 96.51% Spec@95Sens, yielding the highest mean performance across all evaluated metrics. These findings support explicitly modeling interaction direction, token relevance, and sample-dependent integration when constructing multimodal representations.

cs.CV · cs.LG