跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文，按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+96新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-16 00:32 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 01:20 — 2026-11-16 01:20（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-16 00:32最近发现新增版本：2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 00:31（北京时间）
版本更新 · v4arXiv:2608.25097

PhysElite: How Far Are LLMs from Solving Olympiad-Level Physics Problems?

Ruoran Xu, Wending Gao, Liyunfeng Chen, Aixin Shi, Haoyu Cheng, Zixiang Fang, Yiqiang Zou, Qiufeng Wang

原文摘要

Understanding how (multimodal) large language models perform on physics problems requires benchmarks that reflect the difficulty and breadth of expert-level physical reasoning. Existing physics benchmarks remain limited in the following two important ways: (1) short of high-difficulty datasets, and (2) lack of comprehensive coverage of visual forms, knowledge points, and step-by-step solution processes. As a result, model performance on current datasets may not be fully representative of their ability to solve complex physics problems. To address these issues, we present PhysElite, a large-scale bilingual multimodal benchmark for Olympiad-level physics reasoning. PhysElite contains 11,586 Olympiad-tier problems. For each problem, we provide corresponding visual diagrams, step-by-step bilingual Chinese-English solution derivations, and the final answer. We benchmark 18 open-source and closed-source MLLMs, and find that even the strongest model reaches only 33.7% answer accuracy. We additionally conduct step-level process evaluation to diagnose where models fail in the reasoning chain. Our datasets are released at https://github.com/PremiLab-Math/PhysElite.

cs.AI · cs.MM · math-ph

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01967

Better Answers, Weaker Evidence Control: Evidence Bypass in On-Policy Distillation

Ruoran Xu, Yilun Zhao, Ziyu Chen, Xiaoqiang kang, Arman Cohan

原文摘要

On-policy distillation (OPD) can improve answer accuracy while weakening responsiveness to supporting evidence. We investigate this separation in scientific-document question answering through matched document interventions that change the supported answer while preserving the question and unrelated context. We identify evidence bypass: a student retains an originally correct answer after the document changes to support a different one. On QASPER with a Qwen3-4B student, standard OPD raises original-document accuracy by 3.4 percentage points, lowers counterfactual accuracy by 5.3 points, and increases bypass by 15.7 points; the same directional pattern appears on PeerQA. Controlled perturbations localize the shift to answer-critical evidence, and bypass grows with the student's pre-distillation closed-book preference for the original answer. A factorized study of teacher targets, privileged information, divergence, and supervision density finds that explicitly supplying the teacher with annotated answer-critical spans yields the largest joint improvement in evidence response and claim support. These findings motivate Evidence-Paired OPD (EP-OPD), which combines on-policy supervision on matched documents supporting different answers to the same question with an answer-level margin that favors each document's supported answer over its paired alternative. Across both datasets and two student sizes, EP-OPD recovers 54-66% of standard OPD's counterfactual-accuracy loss while preserving 80-85% of its original-document accuracy gain. Our results establish evidence responsiveness as a distinct training and evaluation target alongside answer accuracy. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/RuoranXu/EP-OPD.

cs.CL · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01965

OC-OPD: Observation-coordinated Supervision for On-Policy Distillation

Ruoran Xu, Yilun Zhao, Ziyu Chen, Arman Cohan

原文摘要

Reverse and forward Kullback--Leibler (KL) divergences provide complementary supervision in on-policy distillation: reverse KL refines the student's active token rankings, and forward KL allocates mass to teacher-supported candidates. At student-generated prefixes, we form a four-observation matrix by treating the student and teacher as both candidate sources and evaluators. The diagonal self-observations measure uncertainty, while source-centered cross-observations recover the two KL objectives. We establish an exact identity equating the Fisher inverse-metric coupling of their logit gradients with the sum of these contrasts, yielding a common local descent direction for distinct positive distributions. Observation-coordinated on-policy distillation (OC-OPD) uses observations to set preferences, closed-form bargaining to coordinate gradients, and distributional discrepancy to scale the update. Across three heterogeneous student settings (non-thinking generation, thinking generation, and base-model initialization), OC-OPD achieves strong gains in mathematical reasoning and transfers effectively to out-of-distribution scientific question answering and code generation. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/RuoranXu/OC-OPD.

cs.LG · cs.AI · math.OC

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗