跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 05:40 — 2026-11-16 05:40(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36347

Callosal: Rethinking the Kernel Page Cache for Disaggregated Storage and Memory

James McMahon, Amit Samanta, Seung-seob Lee, Ryan Stutsman, Anurag Khandelwal

原文摘要

Classic distributed filesystems like NFS centralize filesystem operations on a server and use custom, filesystem-specific approaches for managing cache consistency across client nodes. This limits scalability, and it leads to weak consistency, ruling out applications that concurrently access and mutate shared files. Our key insight is that these legacy designs are now too storage-centric; with today's large memories, OS page caches do most of the "heavy lifting" in accessing data, not the filesystem and block storage layers. In response to this, we present Callosal, a page cache for a cluster of machines that is centered on shared disaggregated memory. Rather than serializing operations through a filesystem server and using ad hoc caching like NFS, Callosal is built around the existing Linux page cache paths and is accelerated by RDMA and programmable switches. Callosal delivers the strong consistency that programs expect with local filesystems (like in ext4 and tmpfs) while avoiding the additional network access delays and bottlenecks that host-based solutions incur. We compare Callosal against NFS, CephFS, and local filesystems; often Callosal can provide caching performance similar to local filesystems while also scaling across nodes. For mixed read/write workloads, on average Callosal has 4.6x higher throughput than NFS when contention is not extreme, and it offers strong consistency guarantees like CephFS, while outperforming it. For a file-backed key-value store with 1% writes and uniform access, Callosal scales 1.7x across 4 nodes, while CephFS collapses across nodes.

cs.OS