跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 02:35 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 02:38 — 2026-11-15 02:38(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 02:35最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 02:34(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12714

Polynomial-Space Quantum Algorithms from Classical Branching: Colouring, Domination and Monotone Local Search

Sebastian Senge

原文摘要

We give quantum algorithms for exponential-time problems on $n$ vertices or elements, with bounded error, polynomial space and no quantum random access memory. Our results are these. (1) 4-Colouring in quantum time $O(1.3032^n)$, from a polynomial-space branching algorithm with polynomial-space terminal algorithms; with the branching algorithm alone, $O(1.3100^n)$. The previous best bound in this model, to our knowledge, is $O(1.3231^n)$. (2) $k$-Colouring below the previous best bound for $k \in \{5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11\}$ and $13 \le k \le 18$, from $O(1.4518^n)$ for $k = 5$ to $O(1.9233^n)$ for $k = 18$. (3) Dominating Set in $O(1.2235^n)$, against the previous $O(2^{n/2})$, Independent Dominating Set in $O(1.1583^n)$, and Edge Dominating Set and Minimum Maximal Matching in $O(1.1501^n)$. (4) A quantum form of monotone local search: if the extension problem has a backtracking tree with $c^k$ nodes up to polynomial factors, the problem is solved in quantum time $(2 - 1/c)^{n/2}$ up to polynomial factors. This gives Feedback Vertex Set in $O(1.3081^n)$, Subset and Group Feedback Vertex Set in $O(1.3229^n)$, Cluster Vertex Deletion in $O(1.2033^n)$, 3-Hitting Set in $O(1.2405^n)$, Proper Interval Vertex Deletion in $O(1.3541^n)$, Multicut on Trees in $O(1.1647^n)$ and Min-Ones $d$-SAT in $O^*((2-1/d)^{n/2})$. (5) Quantum exponential-time approximations below the quantum exact bounds, such as a 1.1-approximation for Vertex Cover in $O(1.0555^n)$ and for Feedback Vertex Set in $O(1.2161^n)$. The colouring exponents for $k \ge 6$ come from an evaluation of a known reduction recursion, computed in floating point with a margin.

cs.DS · cs.CC · quant-ph

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.38020

Random Centres and the $\varepsilon$-Dependence of Constant-Round Planar Domination

Sebastian Senge

原文摘要

It was recently shown (arXiv:2610.09618) that the infimum of the approximation ratios of deterministic constant-round LOCAL algorithms for minimum dominating set on planar graphs is 7. The $(7+\varepsilon)$-approximation given there runs in $T_0+O((c_0/\varepsilon)^κ)$ rounds with $κ=\ln 3/\ln(24/23)\approx 25.81$, and it is asked there whether this exponent can be substantially reduced. We replace the heaviest-edge star selection in its clustering step by a random-centre rule: every part becomes a centre independently with probability $p$, and every non-centre joins its heaviest centre neighbour. For planar graphs this gives $κ<5.89$ with $p=3/8$ and $κ<6.7$ with $p=1/2$. For every proper minor-closed class of density $a$, the new exponent is never worse, and with about $\frac12\log_2 a$ fair coins per part and level it is smaller by a factor that tends to $8$ as the density grows. The planar bounds hold verbatim on the torus, the projective plane and the Klein bottle. We then turn to the dependence on $\varepsilon$. On paths, every deterministic $r$-round algorithm for fractional domination, and every randomized one that always outputs a dominating set, has (expected) ratio at least $1+1/(r+4)$. So these approximations need $Ω(1/\varepsilon)$ rounds on every minor-closed class that contains all paths. For fractional domination on paths of known length this is tight up to an additive constant. On forests and on outerplanar graphs, with no bound on the degree, $O(1/\varepsilon)$ rounds suffice, so there the optimal number of rounds is $Θ(1/\varepsilon)$. The planar level bounds, the bounds on paths and the deterministic bound on forests are machine-checked in Lean 4 with Mathlib. Other methods reach ratio $7+\varepsilon$ in fewer rounds against the integral optimum (arXiv:2610.31203) and ratio $7$ in a constant number of rounds (arXiv:2611.02057).

cs.DC

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02256

Exact Shortest Paths and Maximum Flow in Planar Networks in the CONGEST Model

Sebastian Senge

原文摘要

In the CONGEST model, exact single-source shortest paths (SSSP) with nonnegative weights and exact maximum $st$-flow in directed planar networks have both been solved in $\tilde O(D^2)$ rounds, where $D$ is the hop diameter, while the lower bound is $Ω(D)$. Given the approximate distance labels of a recent preprint (arXiv:2606.31192), which we use as a black box, we solve exact directed SSSP in $\tilde O(D)$ rounds. It rests on a lemma that answers queries from a virtual source with the labels, and on a corrected discretization of the reduction of exact to approximate distances (arXiv:2210.16351). All further bounds of the form $\tilde O(D)$ and $D\cdot n^{o(1)}$ use these labels. Through the reduction of arXiv:2303.00811, SSSP with negative weights, or the detection of a negative cycle, takes $D\cdot n^{o(1)}$ rounds with high probability. We weight the face-disjoint graph of arXiv:2411.11718 so that its distances are dual distances, which turns distance problems in the dual into problems in a planar network of hop diameter $O(D)$. This gives exact maximum $st$-flow in directed planar networks in $\min\{\tilde O(D^2),D\cdot n^{o(1)}\}$ rounds with high probability, and in $\tilde O(D)$ rounds with $s,t$ on a common face. In undirected planar networks, the value of a minimum $st$-cut and a minimum cut take $\tilde O(D)$ rounds. For this we repair the auxiliary graphs of arXiv:2608.09500 at $s$ and $t$, and we show that its recursion, as we read it, can miss the minimum cut, also with exact shortest paths: on a network with $11$ vertices it reports $37$ for a minimum cut of $15$. Two more shortest-path computations per level make it exact. The virtual-source lemma, the weighting of the face-disjoint graph and the corrected discretization are machine-checked in Lean 4 with Mathlib; all other arguments are proved on paper only. Numerical checks are not used in any proof.

cs.DC