跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 04:40 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 04:55 — 2026-11-15 04:55(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 04:40最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 04:38(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11279

How Efficient Is Your Agent? Online Predictive Bounds under Budget Constraints

Roy Maor Lotan, Shai Feldman, Yaniv Romano

原文摘要

We evaluate AI agents in an online setting where tasks arrive sequentially and, before running each task, we construct an upper predictive bound on its \emph{time-to-success}---the number of interactions until the task is completed successfully. Under a limited budget, some runs are stopped early, so their time-to-success is unobserved (right-censored), and the correctness of the bound may be unknown. We introduce \emph{\textbf{PR}edictive Bounds for \textbf{O}nline \textbf{B}udget \textbf{E}fficiency} (\texttt{PROBE}), a method for constructing calibrated upper predictive bounds while adaptively allocating a limited budget across agent tasks to reduce the anticipated coverage deficit. Our method calibrates the bounds online using inverse-probability-weighted feedback together with a correction designed to minimize coverage deficit while remaining unbiased. We prove that \texttt{PROBE} provides a coverage guarantee for any finite time horizon while satisfying the budget constraint. Experiments on software engineering, retrieval-augmented generation, and instruction following show that \texttt{PROBE} attains a coverage rate closer to the target level with tighter predictive bounds than a calibrated baseline.

cs.LG