跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 06:23 — 2026-11-16 06:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14239

部分参与下满足一般方差条件的联邦平均算法研究

On Federated Averaging with Partial Participation under a General Variance Condition

Ziming Wang, Kun Huang, Karl Henrik Johansson, Shi Pu

AI 速读 基于摘要

在ABC方差条件下分析部分参与FedAvg的收敛性,给出不依赖有界梯度差异假设的有限时间平稳性界与几乎必然收敛结果。

math.OC · cs.DC · cs.LG

查看原文摘要

In this paper, we study the convergence of Federated Averaging (FedAvg) with partial participation under a general variance condition. In each communication round, the server samples $S$ of the $n$ clients uniformly at random without replacement. The stochastic gradients are assumed to satisfy the so-called ABC condition, which allows their variance to grow with the local objective gaps. For smooth nonconvex objectives, we establish a finite-time stationarity bound in terms of the heterogeneity measure $σ_f^\star:=f^\star-\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n f_i^\star$ and the client sampling factor $I_S:=(n-S)/(n-1)$. Here, $f^\star$ and $f_i^\star$ denote the infima of the global average objective and client $i$'s local objective, respectively. The bound exhibits a linear speedup in the number of sampled clients $S$ and recovers the full-participation result when $S=n$. Under diminishing stepsizes, we further prove that the gradient norm converges to zero both in expectation and almost surely. Notably, compared with existing analyses of FedAvg with partial participation, our results require no additional data heterogeneity assumption such as bounded gradient dissimilarity (BGD), and the sampling-induced term in our bound is not amplified by the number of local updates at the leading order. The importance of removing the BGD assumption is illustrated by an example that is smooth and lower bounded but violates BGD, yet is covered by our analysis.