Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong informal mathematical reasoning but struggle to generate mechanically verifiable proofs in formal languages like Lean. We present LEAP, an agentic framework that enables general-purpose foundation models to achieve state-of-the-art performance on automated formal theorem proving. LEAP leverages foundation model capabilities, such as informal reasoning, instruction following, and iterative self-refinement. By decomposing complex problems into smaller units, the system bridges formal proof construction with informal blueprints through continuous interaction with the Lean compiler. To provide a rigorous evaluation beyond increasingly saturated benchmarks, we introduce Lean-IMO-Bench, a benchmark of IMO-style problems formalized in Lean, with short statements yet highly non-routine and multi-step proofs across a wide range of difficulty levels. Empirically, on the latest 2025 Putnam Competition, an annual mathematics competition for undergraduate students in North America, LEAP solves all 12 problems, matching recent breakthroughs by frontier formal mathematical models. On Lean-IMO-Bench, LEAP boosts the one-shot formal solve rate of general-purpose LLMs from below 10% to 70%, notably surpassing the 48% benchmark set by a specialized, gold-medal-caliber IMO system. Furthermore, we demonstrate LEAP's research-level utility by autonomously formalizing complex proofs for open combinatorial challenges, including a verified proof for a key subproblem in Knuth's Hamiltonian decomposition of even-order Cayley graphs.
Conway's 99-graph problem asks whether a strongly regular graph with parameters srg(99,14,1,2) exists. We develop two complementary lines of attack. Fixing one vertex, the conditions lambda=1 and mu=2 force its neighbourhood to be a perfect matching and determine every edge between that neighbourhood and the remaining vertices. For (99,14,1,2), the unresolved part is therefore a constrained 12-regular graph on 84 vertices. We encode this reduction in CP-SAT and validate it by recovering the unique srg(9,4,1,2). We also prove by exhaustive enumeration that no circulant graph on Z/99 satisfies more than 68.0% of the CAISc constraints, and we give a validated orbit formulation for prescribed automorphisms. We then study the partial-score search problem. Fourteen human-designed search configurations reached at most 69.43%. Separately, we supplied the scoring function to an evolutionary program-search system. It produced a degree-preserving 4-vertex-switch tabu search whose best verified artifact scores 70.73%. The generated move differs from those used in our own searches and crosses a plateau that was stable under them. A tabu search restricted to graphs with a prescribed symmetry group, first Z/33 and then its subgroup of order 11, reaches a 14-regular graph scoring 76.67%. These results do not resolve the existence problem, but they reduce the exact search space and improve the best verified partial construction found in our experiments.