跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 08:47 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 09:36 — 2026-11-15 09:36(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 08:47最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 08:46(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.36457

Memory Consolidation Flattens the Temporal Shape of User Facts

Sugam Panthi, Muhaiminul Yeamin, Siyan Luo, Rabab Abdelfattah

原文摘要

LLM agents with long-term memory store conversations as short notes that later models read. A note can turn progressive "I am working at Corvida" into simple-present "The user works at Corvida," dropping the cue that the job may be temporary and that the stored fact may go stale. We call this aspectual flattening and measure it with LAPSE, a benchmark of matched user statements that differ only in temporal form. Three writer models flattened the progressive statement but kept its simple-present match in 210 of 381 pairs, never the reverse. This one-way loss held in all 11 models tested and in the agent memory systems mem0, Graphiti, and Letta. In exploratory tests, reader models judged a fact less likely to still hold when only its stored verb was progressive. In a planned test, the reader GLM-5.2 acted without asking the user on 64% of "works" notes but 40% of "is working" notes. Gemini 3 Flash showed a smaller gap, one reader added later showed the reverse, and others showed none. In a further exploratory test, free-text notes erased this difference and notes that kept the user's words restored it. Agent memory systems should keep the user's wording as evidence for later readers.

cs.CL