跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 17:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 17:58 — 2026-11-15 17:58(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 17:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 16:59(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11149

ZarrFM: A Canonical Tensor Storage Architecture for EEG Foundation-Model Pretraining

Dheeraj Chintapalli, Sunkalp Chandra

原文摘要

Statistical models for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) increasingly require large, heterogeneous EEG corpora, yet existing datasets vary in sampling rates, channel layouts, window lengths, and storage formats, creating substantial preprocessing and I/O overhead. We propose ZarrFM, an execution-oriented representation that complements BIDS by storing a corpus as a single Zarr v3 hierarchy with indexed metadata, canonical channel spaces, explicit masks, hash-stable subject splits, verified event tables, and block-aligned sharding. On real PhysioNet recordings and synthetic corpora, we compare ZarrFM with EDF, FIF, NPY, HDF5, and Parquet. Across 200 recordings, its two-level index reduces metadata queries from 601 requests to 14. Preserving native signal codes reduces storage from 42.4 MB/hour in EDF to 22.7 MB/hour, while block-aligned sampling reaches 3,131 windows/s, up to 11 times faster than Parquet. Reads remain bit-identical across independent Zarr implementations, and concurrent failure-injected appends recover without data loss. These results show that ZarrFM can provide a compact, interoperable, and execution-efficient storage layer for large-scale EEG pretraining.

cs.LG