跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 21:08 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 22:51 — 2026-11-15 22:51(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 21:08最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 21:07(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.18483

Modality vs. Morphology: A Framework for Time Series Classification for Biological Signals

Jordan Tschida, Matthew Yohe, Edward Kane, Gavin Jager, Emma J. Reid, Tony G. Allen, Mark Story, Leanne Thompson 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Techniques for classifying biological signals are largely developed within specific modalities rather than the underlying signal structure (i.e., morphology), leading to disjointed methodologies and limited guidance across diverse signals. This work introduces a novel morphology--modality framework that connects waveform structure to a principled design of preprocessing, feature extraction, and modeling techniques for biological time-series classification. We analyze evidence across biological signals including electroencephalography, electromyography, electrocardiography, photoplethysmography, and ocular modalities including electrooculography, pupillometry, and eye-tracking, and organize according to their primary morphologies: spikes, bursts, oscillations, slow drift, and hierarchical rhythms. Across these categories, we examine how morphology influences the analytical pipeline from preprocessing to modeling and evaluation. Localized architectures favor spikes and bursts, whereas frequency and temporal models capture oscillations, and hybrid approaches integrate local and global dependencies in hierarchical signals. The associations are not absolute as biological signals often contain multiple morphologies where relevance is task dependent. The proposed framework positions morphology as an inductive biases are useful for modeling. We further identify challenges in cross-subject generalization, morphology-preserving data augmentation, multimodal fusion, and evaluation practices. By linking modality-specific constraints with waveform structure, this review provides guidance for selecting and evaluating pipelines across biological signals. We argue that morphology provides a useful cross-modal lens for developing biological time-series classification systems that are more generalizable, interpretable, and physiologically grounded.

cs.LG · cs.AI