跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 01:33 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:35 — 2026-11-15 01:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 01:33最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 01:32(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11720

ShadowBench-MCP: Measuring Shadow Invocations in MCP-Style Tool Routing

Eyhab Al-Masri, Wenjun Yang

原文摘要

LLM agents increasingly act as routers for tools, APIs, and software-supply-chain workflows, making an execution path - rather than generated text alone - a security-relevant model output. We study shadow invocation: a task-preserving request variant that causes an LLM router to select a riskier execution path, potentially skipping validation, provenance, staging, redaction, or audit controls even though the request does not ask for a malicious action. We introduce ShadowBench-MCP, a benchmark and metric suite that separates task preservation (TPSS), operational pressure (OPSS), and route-geometric drift (RGAS), and combines them in the pre-execution SODS score. In a focused policy-ablation study using a Groq-hosted qwen/qwen3-32b router, 120 routing decisions yield 96 original-versus-variant comparisons across six security-sensitive workflows. Efficiency-first routing produces a 29.2% shadow-invocation rate and 26.7% safety-tool skip rate. Policy-aware routing reduces these to 4.2% and 1.7%, respectively, corresponding to an 85.7% relative reduction in shadow invocations. Pre-execution signals distinguish shadow routes with ROC AUC up to 0.94. These results are early, single-router evidence of a policy-dependent routing-layer security effect, not a claim of universal vulnerability.

cs.CR · cs.AI · cs.MA · eess.SY

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2606.10522

GUI-AC:增强GUI智能体持续学习能力

GUI-AC: Enhancing Continual Learning in GUI Agents

Can Lin, Wenjun Yang, Tao Feng, Hangjie Yuan, Dan Zhang, Yifan Zhu, Zhonghong Ou, Wen Chen 等 9 位作者

AI 速读 基于摘要

GUI-AC提出一种持续强化微调框架,通过优势与策略概率联合刻画grounding rollout并引入grounding certainty,以针对性优化探索与过度自信问题。

cs.CV

查看原文摘要

Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) serve as the dominant medium for human-computer interaction, yet building GUI agents that generalize across the vast diversity of real-world interface environments, with the same flexibility and robustness that humans naturally exhibit, remains unsolved. Notably, GUI data are inherently non-stationary: the continual emergence of previously unseen interface instances (e.g., novel domains and resolutions) induces persistent distribution shifts, significantly impeding the continual learning of existing GUI agents. Reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) has attracted considerable attention as a promising approach. Nevertheless, RFT exhibits pronounced instability in its grounding capability, where rollout outcomes are highly imbalanced and fixed clipping can suppress valuable exploration. More importantly, policy probability alone does not reveal the semantic role of a grounding prediction. To address these challenges, we propose GUI-AC, a continual RFT framework that jointly characterizes grounding rollouts through advantage and policy probability. This yields a four-region view of grounding behavior and enables targeted optimization of Exploration and Overconfidence. GUI-AC further introduces grounding certainty to support two core mechanisms: (i) Adaptive Advantage, which strengthens the negative correction for overconfident grounding failures; and (ii) Dynamic Clipping, which relaxes the upper clipping bound for exploratory grounding rollouts. Extensive experiments show that GUI-AC consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GUI-AC-Code.