跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+96新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 01:10 — 2026-11-16 01:10(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 00:31(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2605.07546

Meta-Scaling Laws: On the Invariance and Generality of Neural Scaling

Xing Han, Liu Ziyin, Suchi Saria, Paul Pu Liang

原文摘要

Neural scaling laws establish a predictable relationship between model performance and data or compute, offering crucial guidance for resource allocation in new domains and tasks. Yet such laws are most needed precisely where they are hardest to obtain: fitting one for a new model and task pair demands expensive sweeps that typically exhaust the very compute budget the law is meant to economize. We study meta-scaling laws: relations that characterize when neural scaling behavior is preserved and predict how it changes under data transformations, enabling forecasts across domains when the shift can be approximated by a compatible transformation. We address this by identifying the right invariants: scaling laws are preserved under bijective (information-preserving) transformations of the data and modified in predictable, information-theoretically grounded ways under non-bijective transformations that lower its information resolution $ρ$: a single axis along which a law fit in one domain can be transported to another. We validate this across language, vision, and speech, and demonstrate two cross-domain applications: predicting scaling for language models trained on electronic health records from laws fit on general text, and predicting time-series classification scaling under varying levels of noise injection, recovering the data-scaling exponents to within $3\%$ error.

cs.LG

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.29927

Does The Way You Plan Matter? An Empirical Study of Planning Representations for LLM Web Agents

Alejandra Zambrano, Sara Vera Marjanovic, Imene Kerboua, Xing Han Lù, Leila Kosseim

原文摘要

Despite recent advances, LLM-based web agents still struggle with limited exploration, omission of critical steps, and sensitivity to task constraints. Prior work suggests that many of these failures stem from weaknesses in planning, yet the impact of alternative natural language plan representations remains unexplored. To address this, we introduce PlanAhead, a static planner-executor framework that evaluates the impact of plan representation on agent performance. We first automatically categorize WebArena tasks into 3 difficulty levels, enabling consistent difficulty grading without human annotation. Then we systematically evaluate 4 different plan representations on the tasks categorized as hard: sequential subgoals, narrative, pseudocode, and checklist; across different families of multimodal LLM-powered agents(OpenAI, Alibaba, and Google). To account for stochastic variability, we introduce a novel decomposition of agent Success Rate (SR) into 2 interpretable evaluation metrics: Achievement Rate (AR) and Solved-Task Consistency (STC). Our results show that both, the plan formulation and the underlying LLM generating the plan, significantly influence web-agent robustness and task success.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.LG

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.932ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Beyond Ranking: Fine-Grained Diagnostics and Self-Improvement for MLLMs

Mingze Xu, Zijing Zhao, Qiming Peng, Houwen Peng, Han Hu, Zhanhui Kang, Yuxing Han Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University

原文摘要

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are advancing rapidly, accurately evaluating their capabilities remains challenging. Current paradigms primarily rely on holistic scoring and static leaderboards, which fail to disentangle fine-grained competencies. Specifically, they suffer from “Outcome Bias” by validating only final answers and ignoring intermediate reasoning. To address these limitations, we introduce ATOM (AnaTomy Of MLLM), a novel MLLM-as-a-judge framework designed to shift the focus from ranking to fine-grained diagnosis. ATOM decomposes complex reasoning into atomic criteria anchored in visual elements, enforcing verification against explicit visual facts. Validated on a newly constructed benchmark with rigorous human rankings, ATOM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, surpassing the strongest baseline by up to 7.92%. Moving beyond ranking, ATOM bridges the gap between assessment and alignment: by pinpointing atomic-level failures, it establishes a closed-loop mechanism for targeted self-correction. This approach enables models to identify and rectify errors autonomously, successfully resolving up to 39.95% of previously failed queries without human intervention.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表