跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 05:29 — 2026-11-16 05:29(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16293

Rasoi: Visual Diffs for Evaluating Structural Changes Made by Coding Agents

Riya Sahni, Aryan Kaul, Anushka Bhatnagar, Xuanming Zhang, Vivian Liu, Reya Vir, Lydia B. Chilton

原文摘要

Coding agents let developers modify software rapidly through natural language. However, as agents take on larger changes, developers can lose track of how the codebase is evolving. These edits may look correct on the surface while restructuring the system in unexpected ways: duplicating logic, changing modules outside the requested scope, removing functionality developers meant to keep, or introducing architectural drift. We investigate how visual diffs can help developers understand and evaluate the structural changes that coding agents make. We present Rasoi, a design probe that maps how a codebase's architecture evolves after each agent-made edit, letting developers inspect which architectural elements and relationships were added, modified, or removed across multiple levels of abstraction. We deployed Rasoi in a week-long study with 12 developers working on their own codebases across varied technical domains. We found that visual diffs helped developers see whether changes stayed within scope, notice unexpected restructuring, and understand how modified parts related to the system as a whole. Our findings suggest that the value of oversight tools for coding agents lies less in making developers trust the agent and more in helping developers feel confident in their own evaluation of agent-made changes. We discuss implications for visual tools that support code comprehension and human oversight in AI-assisted software development.

cs.SE · cs.HC