跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 03:37 — 2026-11-16 03:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11849

Joint LSFC and Nakagami-m Estimation From Downlink SINR in GZF-Precoded CF-mMIMO

Longfei Liu, Yichen Guo, Lili Xu, Yihang Cheng, Tao Peng, Wenbo Wang

原文摘要

Accurate characterization of the instantaneous signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) is important for reliability-sensitive cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (CF-mMIMO) systems. This paper proposes a joint estimation method for link-specific large-scale fading coefficients (LSFCs) and a common Nakagami-$m$ shape parameter using power and downlink SINR measurements. A tractable SINR distribution is first derived under global zero-forcing (GZF) precoding, Nakagami-$m$ fading, and link-level fractional power control (FPC). Based on the derived probability density function (PDF), a model-driven neural network (NN) is developed to solve the resulting maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) problem. Simulations show that the reconstructed SINR distributions obtained with the estimated parameters closely match the empirical distributions. With $2 \times 10^{5}$ samples, the proposed method achieves an LSFC root-mean-square error (RMSE) of approximately 1.0 dB and an $m$ RMSE of approximately 0.085.

cs.IT · eess.SP

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36952

Does More Thinking Pay Off? Reasoning Cost and Correctness of LLMs in Code Generation and Bug Fixing

Andie Huang, Ying Pang, Qian Zhang, Yihang Cheng, Lin Ma

原文摘要

Many LLMs now emit an explicit reasoning trace before they write code, but benchmark results for code generation and bug fixing usually report correctness alone. It is therefore unclear how much the extra reasoning contributes relative to the tokens it consumes. We examine this question with 866 Python tasks drawn from HumanEval Pro, MBPP Pro, and BugsInPy under five model settings. We look at the accuracy gain and token overhead of reasoning, the behaviors that appear inside reasoning traces, and whether a shortened trace still leads to a correct solution. Turning reasoning on in Qwen3-32B over five runs improves mean pass@1 on HumanEval Pro from 71.1% to 76.5% and mean tests pass on BugsInPy from 3.5% to 7.9%. On MBPP Pro the improvement from 68.1% to 69.5% is not statistically significant, even though the model uses a median of over 2,000 thinking tokens per task. Across models, a longer median trace does not reliably mean higher accuracy. A qualitative analysis shows that traces mostly choose and check an implementation in code generation, while in bug fixing they mostly locate the fault and plan the repair. We then truncate stored traces offline and ask Qwen3-32B with reasoning off to produce a solution from what remains. Retaining the first half of a trace yields no statistically significant drop in correctness. Stopping when the trace becomes repetitive seldom triggers, and stopping once solution code first appears benefits some models but harms others. Neither rule beats plain fixed truncation. These results suggest that more reasoning is not always better and that studies should report reasoning cost alongside correctness.

cs.SE