跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 06:30 — 2026-11-16 06:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.34121

Online Stochastic Allocation with Increasing Returns

Shuo Sun, Yunduan Lin

原文摘要

We study online allocation with increasing returns, where an uncertain number of customers arrive sequentially and can be irrevocably assigned to any product with remaining capacity. Each assignment earns a base reward plus a bonus that is nondecreasing in the number of previous assignments to the same product. Prior work has focused primarily on fixed or diminishing returns. Under increasing returns, the central challenge is that concentrating assignments can unlock large future rewards, while a different product may be preferable if arrivals stop early. We show that classical approaches, including greedy and natural LP-based rounding algorithms, can perform arbitrarily poorly, even with homogeneous bonuses. We evaluate performance through competitive ratios relative to the hindsight offline optimum. For homogeneous bonuses, we establish a tight competitive ratio of $1/2$. For arbitrary heterogeneous bonuses, however, no online algorithm can guarantee a competitive ratio greater than $1/m$, where $m$ is the number of products. By imposing discrete concavity on the bonus functions, we limit the concentration of rewards in later assignments and restore constant guarantees. Under this structure, we develop a re-solving framework that repeatedly selects a planning horizon, constructs a feasible allocation plan from the current state, and executes its assignments in a specific order. For arbitrary arrival distributions, we design distribution-oblivious deterministic and randomized algorithms with competitive ratios of $0.2537$ and $0.3864$, respectively. For known increasing-failure-rate (IFR) arrival distributions, we exploit distributional information to obtain a deterministic $1/2$-competitive algorithm.

cs.DS · math.OC