跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 09:49 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 10:28 — 2026-11-15 10:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 09:49最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 09:48(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10846

Efficient SC-Flip Decoding for Polar Codes through Decision-Boundary Normalization

Gulinisha Yiming, Zhongjun Yang, Zhicheng Liu, Zhiming Ma, Xumin Ni, Yuting Liu

原文摘要

Accurate first erroneous position (FEP) identification is key to improving the error-correction performance of successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoding. However, FEP identification remains challenging with a limited number of re-decoding attempts. To address this issue, we propose decision-boundary normalization (DBN) to improve FEP identification and develop a novel DBN-SCF decoding algorithm. DBN normalizes the magnitude of each decision log-likelihood ratio (LLR) by the standard deviation predicted by the Gaussian approximation (GA) for the corresponding bit-channel. This allows a single normalized threshold to be shared across bit-channels within each code configuration, giving it a consistent statistical meaning and avoiding per-channel calibration. DBN-SCF decoding selects candidate flip positions from the information set in the natural successive cancellation (SC) decoding order using a threshold, without sorting. Moreover, DBN-SCF decoding achieves better error-correction performance with a limited number of re-decoding attempts. It also requires lower average decoding complexity than existing SCF decoding methods at a comparable level of error-correction performance.

cs.IT

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.585ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Decoding Scientific Experimental Images: The SPUR Benchmark for Perception, Understanding, and Reasoning

Junpeng Ding, Zichen Tang Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Haihong E Beijing University of Post and Telecommunication, Mengyuan Ji, Yang Liu, Haolin Tian, Haiyang Sun, Pengqi Sun 等 20 位作者

原文摘要

We introduce SPUR, a comprehensive benchmark for scientific experimental image perception, understanding, and reasoning, comprising 4,264 question-answering (QA) pairs derived from 1,084 expert-curated images. SPUR features three key innovations: (1) Panel-Level Fine-Grained Perception: evaluating the visual perception of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) across three dimensions (numerical, morphological, and information localization) on six fine-grained panel types; (2) Cross-Panel Relation Understanding: utilizing complex images with an average of 14.3 panels per sample to evaluate MLLMs’ ability to decipher intricate cross-panel relations; (3) Expert-Level Reasoning: assessment of qualitative and quantitative reasoning across five experimental paradigms to determine if models can infer conclusions from evidence as human experts do. Comprehensive evaluation of 20 MLLMs and four multimodal Chain-of-Thought (MCoT) methods reveals that current models fall significantly short of the expert-level requirements for scientific image interpretation, underscoring a critical bottleneck in AI for Science (AI4S) research.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.976ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

AEGIS: A Holistic Benchmark for Evaluating Forensic Analysis of AI-Generated Academic Images

Bo Zhang, Tzu-Yen Ma, Zichen Tang Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Junpeng Ding, Zirui Wang, Yizhuo Zhao Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Peilin Gao, Zijie Xi 等 21 位作者

原文摘要

We introduce AEGIS, A holistic benchmark for Evaluating forensic analysis of AI-Generated academic ImageS. Compared to existing benchmarks, AEGIS features three key advances: (1) Domain-Specific Complexity: covering seven academic categories with 39 fine-grained subtypes, exposing intrinsic forensic difficulty, where even GPT-5.1 reaches 48.80% overall performance and expert models achieve only limited localization accuracy (IoU 30.09%); (2) Diverse Forgery Simulations: modeling four prevalent academic forgery strategies across 25 generative models, with 11 yielding average forensic accuracy below 50%, showing that forensics lag behind generative advances; and (3) Multi-Dimensional Forensic Evaluation: jointly assessing detection, reasoning, and localization, revealing complementary strengths between model families, with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) at 84.74% accuracy in textual artifact recognition and expert detectors peaking at 79.54% accuracy in binary authenticity detection. By evaluating 25 leading MLLMs, nine expert models, and one unified multimodal understanding and generation model, AEGIS serves as a diagnostic testbed exposing fundamental limitations in academic image forensics.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表