跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 03:57 — 2026-11-16 03:57(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v7arXiv:2601.03079

Learning to Diagnose and Correct Moral Errors in Large Language Models

Bocheng Chen, Xi Chen, Han Zi, Haitao Mao, Zimo Qi, Xitong Zhang, Yuda Chen, Kristen Johnson 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Enabling large language models (LLMs) to diagnose and correct moral errors is crucial not only for ensuring their reliable deployment but also for charting a pathway toward continuous improvement. Existing research has primarily followed two directions: fine-tuning LLMs on corpora of morally appropriate texts and developing carefully designed prompting strategies to promote moral behavior, including moral self-correction and self-improvement. However, both lines of work often remain brittle, relying heavily on shallow heuristics rather than enabling LLMs to reason about why and how a given moral discourse is morally (in)appropriate. In this paper, we address this challenge by developing pragmatic inference-driven approach that help LLMs learn to diagnose and correct moral errors. Pragmatic inference is the reasoning process through which implied meanings are derived, a central concept in linguistics. To improve the reasoning efficiency, our approach adapt the inference procedure according to the inferential load required by different moral discourses. Empirical results demonstrate that our method not only improves LLMs' ability to diagnose and correct moral errors, but also generalizes effectively across tasks without relying on shallow heuristics.

cs.CL