跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2408.05086 · v4

A systematic framework for generating novel experimental hypotheses from language models

首次提交 2024-08-09 22:17
版本更新 2026-11-07 05:21
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Neural language models (LMs) have been shown to capture complex linguistic patterns, yet their utility in understanding human language and more broadly, human cognition, remains debated. While existing work in this area often evaluates human-machine alignment, few studies attempt to translate findings from this enterprise into novel insights about humans. To this end, we propose a systematic framework for hypothesis generation that uses LMs to simulate outcomes of experiments that do not yet exist in the literature. We instantiate this framework in the context of a specific research question in child language development: dative verb acquisition and cross-structural generalization. Through this instantiation, we derive two novel, untested hypotheses: (1) the alignment between argument ordering and discourse prominence features of exposure contexts modulates how children generalize new verbs to unobserved structures; and (2) that this alignment in the first postverbal argument of the exposure context has a more noteworthy effect. Additionally, we also design a set of experiments that can test these hypotheses in the lab with children. This work contributes both a domain-general framework for systematic hypothesis generation via simulated learners and domain-specific, lab-testable hypotheses for child language acquisition research.

作者备注:Revised version

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-11-07 05:21 · 最新观测版本

A systematic framework for generating novel experimental hypotheses from language models

Neural language models (LMs) have been shown to capture complex linguistic patterns, yet their utility in understanding human language and more broadly, human cognition, remains debated. While existing work in this area often evaluates human-machine alignment, few studies attempt to translate findings from this enterprise into novel insights about humans. To this end, we propose a systematic framework for hypothesis generation that uses LMs to simulate outcomes of experiments that do not yet exist in the literature. We instantiate this framework in the context of a specific research question in child language development: dative verb acquisition and cross-structural generalization. Through this instantiation, we derive two novel, untested hypotheses: (1) the alignment between argument ordering and discourse prominence features of exposure contexts modulates how children generalize new verbs to unobserved structures; and (2) that this alignment in the first postverbal argument of the exposure context has a more noteworthy effect. Additionally, we also design a set of experiments that can test these hypotheses in the lab with children. This work contributes both a domain-general framework for systematic hypothesis generation via simulated learners and domain-specific, lab-testable hypotheses for child language acquisition research.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗