跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2505.13231 · v2

Investigating Active Sampling for Hardness Classification with Vision-Based Tactile Sensors

首次提交 2025-05-19 23:15
版本更新 2026-10-27 18:30
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Hardness is one of the most important object properties that humans and robots perceive through touch. This paper investigates active sampling strategies for sample-efficient hardness classification with vision-based tactile sensors (VBTS), using information-theoretic measures of model uncertainty. We evaluated three probabilistic classifier models and two active sampling strategies and a random sampling baseline on a hardness classification task, with our own dataset of VBTS samples collected by a robot and a previously published dataset. In addition, we conducted a human study on the hardness classification task with the same objects as our dataset. Our findings indicate that the active sampling approaches, driven by variance and entropy as measures of model uncertainty, perform best with accuracy reaching 90%, compared to human accuracy of 48%, demonstrating the effectiveness of using VBTS for hardness classification. More information can be found at: https://fheller1.github.io/ActiveHardness

作者备注:Accepted at IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2026) Project page: https://fheller1.github.io/ActiveHardness

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-27 18:30 · 最新观测版本

Investigating Active Sampling for Hardness Classification with Vision-Based Tactile Sensors

Hardness is one of the most important object properties that humans and robots perceive through touch. This paper investigates active sampling strategies for sample-efficient hardness classification with vision-based tactile sensors (VBTS), using information-theoretic measures of model uncertainty. We evaluated three probabilistic classifier models and two active sampling strategies and a random sampling baseline on a hardness classification task, with our own dataset of VBTS samples collected by a robot and a previously published dataset. In addition, we conducted a human study on the hardness classification task with the same objects as our dataset. Our findings indicate that the active sampling approaches, driven by variance and entropy as measures of model uncertainty, perform best with accuracy reaching 90%, compared to human accuracy of 48%, demonstrating the effectiveness of using VBTS for hardness classification. More information can be found at: https://fheller1.github.io/ActiveHardness

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗