← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2505.19969 · v4
Differential Privacy of Decentralized Learning: Centralized Rate Conditions and Nearly Tight Guarantees
首次提交 2025-05-26 21:31
版本更新 2026-10-27 21:32
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
摘要
We analyze the differential privacy of gossip averaging on a graph with independent Gaussian noise at every node, as seen by a subset of observing nodes. We characterize the privacy loss of any sensitive node over multiple gossip steps as that of a Gaussian mechanism whose sensitivity is the solution to a binary quadratic problem with a coefficient matrix determined by the gossip matrix. We recognize this matrix as a Toeplitz matrix plus a small correction, and show that its Toeplitz symbol controls how the DP guarantees grow with the number of steps. Under a computable condition on the Toeplitz symbol, the privacy guarantee matches that of a trusted central aggregator, and we give a utility bound for strongly convex learning problems that similarly matches the centralized case. Finally, we give numerical recipes for upper and lower bounds on the DP guarantees. On realistic test cases, the two bounds agree to within a few percent.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v4 · 2026-10-27 21:32 · 最新观测版本
Differential Privacy of Decentralized Learning: Centralized Rate Conditions and Nearly Tight Guarantees
We analyze the differential privacy of gossip averaging on a graph with independent Gaussian noise at every node, as seen by a subset of observing nodes. We characterize the privacy loss of any sensitive node over multiple gossip steps as that of a Gaussian mechanism whose sensitivity is the solution to a binary quadratic problem with a coefficient matrix determined by the gossip matrix. We recognize this matrix as a Toeplitz matrix plus a small correction, and show that its Toeplitz symbol controls how the DP guarantees grow with the number of steps. Under a computable condition on the Toeplitz symbol, the privacy guarantee matches that of a trusted central aggregator, and we give a utility bound for strongly convex learning problems that similarly matches the centralized case. Finally, we give numerical recipes for upper and lower bounds on the DP guarantees. On realistic test cases, the two bounds agree to within a few percent.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗