跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2505.19969 · v4

Differential Privacy of Decentralized Learning: Centralized Rate Conditions and Nearly Tight Guarantees

首次提交 2025-05-26 21:31
版本更新 2026-10-27 21:32
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We analyze the differential privacy of gossip averaging on a graph with independent Gaussian noise at every node, as seen by a subset of observing nodes. We characterize the privacy loss of any sensitive node over multiple gossip steps as that of a Gaussian mechanism whose sensitivity is the solution to a binary quadratic problem with a coefficient matrix determined by the gossip matrix. We recognize this matrix as a Toeplitz matrix plus a small correction, and show that its Toeplitz symbol controls how the DP guarantees grow with the number of steps. Under a computable condition on the Toeplitz symbol, the privacy guarantee matches that of a trusted central aggregator, and we give a utility bound for strongly convex learning problems that similarly matches the centralized case. Finally, we give numerical recipes for upper and lower bounds on the DP guarantees. On realistic test cases, the two bounds agree to within a few percent.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-10-27 21:32 · 最新观测版本

Differential Privacy of Decentralized Learning: Centralized Rate Conditions and Nearly Tight Guarantees

We analyze the differential privacy of gossip averaging on a graph with independent Gaussian noise at every node, as seen by a subset of observing nodes. We characterize the privacy loss of any sensitive node over multiple gossip steps as that of a Gaussian mechanism whose sensitivity is the solution to a binary quadratic problem with a coefficient matrix determined by the gossip matrix. We recognize this matrix as a Toeplitz matrix plus a small correction, and show that its Toeplitz symbol controls how the DP guarantees grow with the number of steps. Under a computable condition on the Toeplitz symbol, the privacy guarantee matches that of a trusted central aggregator, and we give a utility bound for strongly convex learning problems that similarly matches the centralized case. Finally, we give numerical recipes for upper and lower bounds on the DP guarantees. On realistic test cases, the two bounds agree to within a few percent.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗