跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2509.11789 · v2

costream: A Streaming Evaluation Protocol for Wearable Fall Detection

首次提交 2025-09-15 19:19
版本更新 2026-11-12 21:27
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Wearable fall detectors are commonly evaluated on presegmented windows, where a fall window is extracted at an annotated impact and non-fall windows are sampled from fall-free signal. However, a deployed detector processes a continuous sensor stream in which the location of a fall is unknown. We specify a streaming evaluation protocol in which a detector traverses an unsegmented recording, aggregates window-level scores into a temporal confidence map, and emits timestamped events that are evaluated against the annotated fall. Holding the dataset, participant-wise splits, window construction and fitted models fixed, we compare presegmented and streaming evaluation on clinically verified real-world falls. The two protocols identify the same best-performing method overall, but select different methods in 6 of 20 model-window configurations, with the divergence associated with differences in the temporal clustering of false alarms. Streaming evaluation also exposes deployment-relevant quantities, including false alarm rate over elapsed monitoring time, detection delay, and the effect of the decision threshold, that are not captured by per-window evaluation. These results show that evaluation protocol can materially affect conclusions about wearable fall detectors and should be considered when assessing their suitability for continuous monitoring.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-12 21:27 · 最新观测版本

costream: A Streaming Evaluation Protocol for Wearable Fall Detection

Wearable fall detectors are commonly evaluated on presegmented windows, where a fall window is extracted at an annotated impact and non-fall windows are sampled from fall-free signal. However, a deployed detector processes a continuous sensor stream in which the location of a fall is unknown. We specify a streaming evaluation protocol in which a detector traverses an unsegmented recording, aggregates window-level scores into a temporal confidence map, and emits timestamped events that are evaluated against the annotated fall. Holding the dataset, participant-wise splits, window construction and fitted models fixed, we compare presegmented and streaming evaluation on clinically verified real-world falls. The two protocols identify the same best-performing method overall, but select different methods in 6 of 20 model-window configurations, with the divergence associated with differences in the temporal clustering of false alarms. Streaming evaluation also exposes deployment-relevant quantities, including false alarm rate over elapsed monitoring time, detection delay, and the effect of the decision threshold, that are not captured by per-window evaluation. These results show that evaluation protocol can materially affect conclusions about wearable fall detectors and should be considered when assessing their suitability for continuous monitoring.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗