跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2509.22574 · v2

Machine learning approaches to seismic event classification in the Ostrava region

首次提交 2025-09-27 00:51
版本更新 2026-11-09 03:50
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The north-eastern part of the Czech Republic, including the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, is among the most seismically active areas of the country. The seismic stations in the region record mining-induced events, which continue after the cessation of mining, natural earthquakes, which are rare but may originate in the same area, and quarry blasts. A rapid and reliable distinction between the three types is required for the routine evaluation of the continuously recorded data. We study their automatic discrimination with neural networks from short three-component windows starting one second before the P-wave onset. The main data set is the archive of the Seismic Polygon Frenštát (1992--2002), a triggered network whose records were recovered from the original format, cleaned with deterministic and learned quality checks and completed with automatically picked P-wave arrivals; it contains about 40,000 records of all three event types. Among five compared architectures, convolutional networks operating on short-time spectrograms outperform recurrent networks operating on magnitude spectra or on the raw waveform. The best model, EfficientNet-B0 applied to 24-s windows, reaches a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.96, and blasts and natural earthquakes are practically never confused with each other; class weighting and undersampling, the usual remedies for the strong class imbalance, lower the score. Finally, we examine the transfer to the station OKC, which monitors the region today with different instruments. A model trained on the archive alone fails on the modern records, whereas a single model trained on both data sets reaches a macro-F1 score of 0.96 on the archive and 0.92 on the modern station, where the accuracy is limited by the small number of catalogued natural earthquakes rather than by the model.

作者备注:v2: 29 pages, 3 figures, 13 tables; improved data cleaning and extended analysis to three-class classification

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-09 03:50 · 最新观测版本

Machine learning approaches to seismic event classification in the Ostrava region

The north-eastern part of the Czech Republic, including the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, is among the most seismically active areas of the country. The seismic stations in the region record mining-induced events, which continue after the cessation of mining, natural earthquakes, which are rare but may originate in the same area, and quarry blasts. A rapid and reliable distinction between the three types is required for the routine evaluation of the continuously recorded data. We study their automatic discrimination with neural networks from short three-component windows starting one second before the P-wave onset. The main data set is the archive of the Seismic Polygon Frenštát (1992--2002), a triggered network whose records were recovered from the original format, cleaned with deterministic and learned quality checks and completed with automatically picked P-wave arrivals; it contains about 40,000 records of all three event types. Among five compared architectures, convolutional networks operating on short-time spectrograms outperform recurrent networks operating on magnitude spectra or on the raw waveform. The best model, EfficientNet-B0 applied to 24-s windows, reaches a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.96, and blasts and natural earthquakes are practically never confused with each other; class weighting and undersampling, the usual remedies for the strong class imbalance, lower the score. Finally, we examine the transfer to the station OKC, which monitors the region today with different instruments. A model trained on the archive alone fails on the modern records, whereas a single model trained on both data sets reaches a macro-F1 score of 0.96 on the archive and 0.92 on the modern station, where the accuracy is limited by the small number of catalogued natural earthquakes rather than by the model.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗