← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2510.25569 · v2
A Framework for Bounding Deterministic Risk with PAC-Bayes: Applications to Majority Votes
首次提交 2025-10-29 22:38
版本更新 2026-11-10 00:18
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
摘要
PAC-Bayes is a popular and efficient framework for obtaining generalization guarantees in situations involving uncountable hypothesis spaces. Unfortunately, in its classical formulation, it only provides guarantees on the expected risk of a randomly sampled hypothesis. This requires stochastic predictions at test time, making PAC-Bayes unusable in many practical situations where a single deterministic hypothesis must be deployed. We propose a unified framework for extracting guarantees for a single hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian guarantees. We present a general derandomization framework, and derive from it a numerical bound for majority votes and for three different probability distributions over the posterior space. We study the empirical behaviour of our approach, showing that it consistently outperforms popular baselines in terms of generalization bounds for single classifiers (by up to a factor of 2), but sometimes requires a sacrifice in accuracy.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-10 00:18 · 最新观测版本
A Framework for Bounding Deterministic Risk with PAC-Bayes: Applications to Majority Votes
PAC-Bayes is a popular and efficient framework for obtaining generalization guarantees in situations involving uncountable hypothesis spaces. Unfortunately, in its classical formulation, it only provides guarantees on the expected risk of a randomly sampled hypothesis. This requires stochastic predictions at test time, making PAC-Bayes unusable in many practical situations where a single deterministic hypothesis must be deployed. We propose a unified framework for extracting guarantees for a single hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian guarantees. We present a general derandomization framework, and derive from it a numerical bound for majority votes and for three different probability distributions over the posterior space. We study the empirical behaviour of our approach, showing that it consistently outperforms popular baselines in terms of generalization bounds for single classifiers (by up to a factor of 2), but sometimes requires a sacrifice in accuracy.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗