跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2511.09021 · v4

Minimal Regret Walras Equilibria for Combinatorial Markets

首次提交 2025-11-12 14:14
版本更新 2026-11-12 16:03
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We consider combinatorial multi-item markets and propose the notion of a $Δ$-regret Walrasian equilibrium, consisting of an allocation and item prices such that prices clear the market, the allocation is capacity-feasible, and the players' strategies lead to a total regret of at most $Δ$. Regret is the sum of the players' utility gaps relative to optimal bundles at the given prices. We derive a complete characterization for the existence of $Δ$-regret equilibria by introducing the concept of a parameterized social welfare problem, where only the capacity constraints binding at a prescribed allocation are retained. Our characterization then relates the achievable regret value to the associated duality/integrality gap of the parameterized social welfare problem at that allocation. For the special case of monotone valuations and upwards-closed strategy spaces this translates to regret bounds recovering the duality/integrality gap of the original social welfare problem. We also characterize weighted buyer and seller regret by configuration-LP gaps and establish a finite exact penalty enforcing market clearing. We further derive a slack-dependent price-adjustment bound whose uniform version is sharp for prescribed allocations. Finally, these structural results translate approximation algorithms for social welfare with guarantees relative to the configuration LP into algorithms computing low-regret Walrasian equilibria. We also derive lower bounds from integrality and duality gaps and computational complexity.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-11-12 16:03 · 最新观测版本

Minimal Regret Walras Equilibria for Combinatorial Markets

We consider combinatorial multi-item markets and propose the notion of a $Δ$-regret Walrasian equilibrium, consisting of an allocation and item prices such that prices clear the market, the allocation is capacity-feasible, and the players' strategies lead to a total regret of at most $Δ$. Regret is the sum of the players' utility gaps relative to optimal bundles at the given prices. We derive a complete characterization for the existence of $Δ$-regret equilibria by introducing the concept of a parameterized social welfare problem, where only the capacity constraints binding at a prescribed allocation are retained. Our characterization then relates the achievable regret value to the associated duality/integrality gap of the parameterized social welfare problem at that allocation. For the special case of monotone valuations and upwards-closed strategy spaces this translates to regret bounds recovering the duality/integrality gap of the original social welfare problem. We also characterize weighted buyer and seller regret by configuration-LP gaps and establish a finite exact penalty enforcing market clearing. We further derive a slack-dependent price-adjustment bound whose uniform version is sharp for prescribed allocations. Finally, these structural results translate approximation algorithms for social welfare with guarantees relative to the configuration LP into algorithms computing low-regret Walrasian equilibria. We also derive lower bounds from integrality and duality gaps and computational complexity.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗